Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| playground:playground [2015/06/04 12:46] – epsatisep | playground:playground [2021/03/23 11:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== | + | ====== |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Title** : Autonomous Sailing Boat | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | **Author(s)**: | + | |
| - | * Roberto Giordano | + | |
| - | * Gizem Ozturk | + | |
| - | * Gary Jonathan Rabone | + | |
| - | * Marc Navarrete Hill | + | |
| - | * Imre Asztalos | + | |
| - | * Thies Gunther | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Acknowledgement | + | |
| - | Finishing the 4 months project of the autonomous sail boat, we want to thank all the teachers involved in the different classes taught, as well as the supervisors that guided us patiently and competent through the whole project. It was for all of us a great experience full of hard work, great companionship that extended at the end our horizons in on a cultural and also educational level. Furthermore we are thankful that the “Instutito Superior de Engenharia do Porto” (ISEP) offered us the chance to stay in Porto and do the European Project Semester (EPS). A special thanks to Fernando Ferreira who was a great support throughout the whole project. He guided us towards the accomplishment of the project and ensured the correct progress. | + | |
| - | ===== Abstract ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | At present, the ocean suffers greatly as a result of ever-growing population and disasters occur all over the world. A maneuverable ocean exploring monitoring system has been a state of the art subject for several years. The advancements in the field can be used in several market sectors and developed overtime. This system can be used for research and development purposes. The system can monitor oceans while maintaining the desired energy efficiency measures. Horizon Sail is developing an innovative rigid-wing for a sailboat likely to sail the oceans and capture data without human interaction. The product will be marketed on several platforms to be used widely in several industries. Many technical aspects still have to be have studied and developed, especially regarding the boat that will be subjected to adverse climate conditions in unmanned areas, reducing the human assistance if damage occurs. | + | |
| - | ===== Abbreviations ===== | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 400px> | + | |
| - | ^ Abbreviation ^ Description ^ | + | |
| - | |4P | Product, Place, Price and Promotion | | + | |
| - | |${a_1}$| Distance from Hull and Top of the Mast | | + | |
| - | |${a_2}$| High of the Geometrical Centre of the Reefed Sail | | + | |
| - | |Ah | Ampere hour | | + | |
| - | |AIDA | Attention, Interest, Desire and Action | | + | |
| - | |AMS | Autonomous Marine System | | + | |
| - | |AP | Aft Perpendicular | | + | |
| - | |${A_x}$| Maximum Section Area Below Designed Waterline | | + | |
| - | |B | Beam | | + | |
| - | |${B_1}$| New Buoyancy Centre | | + | |
| - | |B2B | Business to Business | + | |
| - | |B2G | Business to Government | | + | |
| - | |BD | Boom Height Above Deck | | + | |
| - | |${B_{WL}}$| Beam of Waterline | | + | |
| - | |${C_B}$| Block Coefficient | + | |
| - | |CB | Centre of Buoyancy | | + | |
| - | |CCS | Carbon Capture and Storage | | + | |
| - | |${C_D}$| Drag Coefficient | | + | |
| - | |CE | Aerodynamic Centre of Effort | | + | |
| - | |${C_F}$| Skin Friction Coefficient | | + | |
| - | |CG | Centre of Gravity | | + | |
| - | |CHP | Combined Heat and Power | | + | |
| - | |${C_L}$| Lift Coefficient | | + | |
| - | |CLR | Hydrodynamic Centre of Lateral Resistance | + | |
| - | |${C_{Lr}}$ | Rudder Lift Coefficient | | + | |
| - | |CNC | Computer Numerical Control | | + | |
| - | |${CO_2}$ | Carbon Dioxide | | + | |
| - | |CP | Prismatic Coefficient | | + | |
| - | |CS | Carbon Capturing System | | + | |
| - | |d | Distance | | + | |
| - | |D | Drag | | + | |
| - | |dBm | Decibel-Milliwatts | | + | |
| - | |DFA | Design for Assembly | | + | |
| - | |DFD | Design for Disassembly | | + | |
| - | |${D_{WL}}$| Designed Waterline | | + | |
| - | |EMAS | European Management and Audit Scheme | | + | |
| - | |EPS | European Project Semester | | + | |
| - | |EU | European Union | | + | |
| - | |${F_1}$| Hydrodynamic Force | | + | |
| - | |${F_A}$| Aerodynamic Force | | + | |
| - | |${F_h}$| Horizontal Boom Force | | + | |
| - | |${F_{LAT}}$| Aerodynamic Side Force | | + | |
| - | |${F_M}$| Driving Force | | + | |
| - | |FP | Forward Perpendicular | | + | |
| - | |ft | Feet | | + | |
| - | |${F_V}$| Vertical Boom Force | | + | |
| - | |G | Centre of gravity | | + | |
| - | |GDP | Gross Domestic Produce | | + | |
| - | |GPRS | General Packet Radio Service | | + | |
| - | |GPS | Global Positioning System | + | |
| - | |GWh | Giga Watt hour | | + | |
| - | |h | Height | | + | |
| - | |ISEP | Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto | | + | |
| - | |ISO | International Organization for Standardization | + | |
| - | |kg | kilogram | | + | |
| - | |l | Horizontal Length of Rudder at Centre of Effort, or Long Span of Panel, or Stiffener Length | | + | |
| - | |L | Lift | | + | |
| - | |LCB | Longitudinal Centre of Buoyancy | | + | |
| - | |${L_{OA}}$| Length overall | | + | |
| - | |LOBO | Land/Ocean Biogeochemical Observatory | | + | |
| - | |${L_{PP}}$| Length Between Perpendiculars | | + | |
| - | |LSA | Autonomous System Laboratory | | + | |
| - | |${L_{WL}}$| Length of waterline | | + | |
| - | |M | Bending moment, or metacentre | + | |
| - | |m | Meter | | + | |
| - | |MHz | Megahertz | | + | |
| - | |MIS | Management Information System | | + | |
| - | |${M_r}$| Rudder Bending Moment | | + | |
| - | |MW | Mega Watt | | + | |
| - | |N | Newton | | + | |
| - | |NACA (NASA) | National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics | | + | |
| - | |NERC | National Environment Resource Council | | + | |
| - | |NIST | International System of Units | | + | |
| - | |NOC | National Oceanography Centre | | + | |
| - | |ɵ | Heel angle | | + | |
| - | |P | Height of Mainsail (IOR), or Propeller Pitch, or Load, General | | + | |
| - | |${P_a}$| Dimensioning Aft Stay Load | | + | |
| - | |${P_{fo}}$| Dimensioning Outer Forestay Load | | + | |
| - | |${P_{LAT}}$| Hydrodynamic Side Force | | + | |
| - | |R&D | Research and Development | | + | |
| - | |${R_F}$| Frictional Resistance | | + | |
| - | |RM | Righting Moment | | + | |
| - | |${R_n}$| Reynolds Number | + | |
| - | |ROHS | Restriction of Hazardous Substances | | + | |
| - | |S.W.O.T | Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats | | + | |
| - | |SAN | Styrene Acryrin | | + | |
| - | |${S_W}$| Wetted Surface Area | | + | |
| - | |T| Draft | | + | |
| - | |${T_1}$| Wave Period, or Transverse Foresail Force | | + | |
| - | |${T_2}$| Transverse Mainsail Force | | + | |
| - | |${T_{boom}}$| Transverse Force at Foot of Mainsail | | + | |
| - | |${T_{bu}}$| Upper Boom Force | | + | |
| - | |${t_c}$| Core Thickness | | + | |
| - | |${T_{head}}$| Transverse Force at Top of Mainsail | | + | |
| - | |${T_{hl}}$| Lower Shroud Force | | + | |
| - | |${T_{hu}}$| Upper Shroud Force | | + | |
| - | |TWh | Tera Watt Hour | | + | |
| - | |US | United States | | + | |
| - | |USB | Universal Serial Bus | | + | |
| - | |V | Volt | | + | |
| - | |${V_A}$| Apparent Wind Directions | | + | |
| - | |${V_d}$ | Volume Displacement | | + | |
| - | |VOC | Volatile Organic Compounds | | + | |
| - | |${V_S}$| Yacht Speed (m/s) | | + | |
| - | |Wh | Watt Hour | | + | |
| - | |WIPE | World Intellectual Property Organization | | + | |
| - | |WOW | Wally Over Wing | | + | |
| - | |X, Y, Z | Cartesian Coordinates, | + | |
| - | |α | Angle of Attack | | + | |
| - | |λ | Wavelength or Taper Ratio | | + | |
| - | |ρ | Density | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ===== 1. Introduction ===== | + | |
| - | " | + | |
| - | - **Michael Jordan** | + | |
| - | ==== 1.1 Presentation ==== | + | |
| - | Our team consists of six multinational, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The programme also offers additional classes such as Team building, Project Management, Communication, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === Our Crew === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe1> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | ^ Roberto Giordano | + | |
| - | | {{: | + | |
| - | | Management in Engineering | + | |
| - | | Italy | Turkey | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel1> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 1.2 Motivation ==== | + | |
| - | The decision to select a suitable project which covered all our skill sets was a difficult one out of the 15 project proposals. The final choice was to design, manufacture and deliver a autonomous sailboat to a client who specializes in the field of autonomous systems. The motivation for our team decision is based on several conditions, listed below: | + | |
| - | - **Team Contribution**: | + | |
| - | - **Innovation**: | + | |
| - | - **Challenge**: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Each team member also had their say: | + | |
| - | * **Roberto Giordano:** "//I selected this project to better understand an ancient but still modern mode of transportation, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * **Gizem Oztruk:** "//I choose this project because it was really interesting to build a boat and it will provide me a different perspective, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * **Gary Jonathan Rabone:** "//I chose the project due to its challenge and relevance to my field of study, furthermore its appeal was grown by working with an accomplished institute in the autonomous control system sector// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * **Marc Navarrete Hill:** "//I selected that project because I immediately recognised that I could implement all the design skills that I have currently studied during my advanced education and moreover because the sea is one of my passions and always wanted to design a naval mode of transport// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * **Imre Asztalos:** "// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * **Thies Gunther:** "//The project was appealing I had the feeling that in our interdisciplinary team everybody could contribute to the project. Due to the fact the technology of the autonomous sailing is relatively new, we all can benefit from the knowledge of new technology// | + | |
| - | ==== 1.3 Problem ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Although none of our members is specialised in naval engineering, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 1.4 Objectives ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The objective of this project is to build a boat that has the ability to store and collect data in a changing environment. The boat shall be able to stay in a prior defined area for a longer time (months). The environment can be any possible body of water such as ocean, lakes or river. The focus is to design a boat that is extremely stable and reliable when completing its various missions. It is key for the modular design of a control system that is adjustable for different sensors or even cameras. The sail shall consist of a rigid wing-sail and the boat shall not exceed the dimensions of 3 meters. Due to an easier navigation it only consists of one rudder. Furthermore we have to find different power supply solutions to ensure a constant functioning of all electrical components. Besides we will have to do a market research to find prospective clients and purposes that our boat will be able to fulfill. Our target is to design a boat that is, in respective to sustainability, | + | |
| - | ==== 1.5 Requirements ==== | + | |
| - | There are a number of requirements that the boat must be adhered to: | + | |
| - | * The boat has to withstand adverse environmental conditions while in operation. | + | |
| - | * It must be unsinkable and retraceable if damaged. | + | |
| - | * Backup motor system fro zero wind conditions. | + | |
| - | * Capable of venturing on missions for extensive periods of time. | + | |
| - | * The boat must comprehend and accommodate autonomous components such as sensors for wind, depth, current and location. | + | |
| - | * Single rigid sail and single rudder boat. | + | |
| - | * The boat must operate in a certain area. | + | |
| - | * Sustainable methods of power through the environment. (wind, solar, currents) | + | |
| - | * A 1:1 scale model must be designed, **(1)** Styrofoam prototype **(2)** Final Product. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Comply with the following EU Directives: | + | |
| - | - Machine Directive ([[http:// | + | |
| - | - Electrical Safety: Low Level Voltage Directive ([[http:// | + | |
| - | - Restriction of Hazardous Substances (ROHS) in Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive ([[http:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Mandatory adoption and use of the International System of Units ([[http:// | + | |
| - | ==== 1.6 Functional Tests ==== | + | |
| - | The model and final product will be subjected to a variety of tests to ensure its integrity in its requirements to for fill the desired roles of the client. The main tests that will be undertaken are buoyancy for the hull and lift on the sail. We are also going to test the boat as a whole to ensure these functional test cooperate to allow the boat to be fully functional. It is a necessity to have to check if all the used components are correctly positioned and assembled during these tests to avoid inaccurate data. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===1.6.1 Buoyancy Test === | + | |
| - | Conducting this test will validate our boat design from geometry and weight predictions from materials and components. This test we will use the water tank in the LSA laboratory. The main idea is to see if we balanced our boat the right way and if the material used is causing an appropriate buoyancy. The boat will have a prefixed maximum capacity of 60 kg, to ensure our boat is viable in this test we will fill the boat with 70 kg plus an exceeded weighted body as a tolerance, this will validate that the boat will float when exceeded weight is applied. This test will ensure if any future upgrades to components of unexpected weight will be accepted by the boat. The keel and hull have to be calculated and designed the right way as our learning outcome of the state of the art chapter taught us. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===1.6.2 Sail Lift Test === | + | |
| - | This test will consist of the rigid wing-sail stalled in position with a variety of weights applied to a pulley. The lifting force will be calculated from the amount of weight it can lift off the ground. The driving force will be a fan obtained form LSA to adjust the lifting force in particular angles and positions, the fan will be positioned to cover the maximum surface area for the initial test. This will ensure the rigid sail is functioning correctly and also giving the boat an appropriate velocity. We have to make sure that this is done in a secure area so we do not lose the boat or it will be destroyed in the first place. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 1.6.3 Boat/Sail Manoeuvrability === | + | |
| - | This final test will validate the product to the customer and shareholders as a success. The test will consist of the assembly of hull and sail finalising the boat, it will be subjected to a body of water and controlled via fans positioned in different areas. The boat must manoeuvre through a subject area without deviating from the path to be considered successful. This test will take a vast amount of preparation and team work to be achieved. The help of LSA will be greatly appreciated as an expert body to oversee our test. | + | |
| - | ==== 1.7 Use Cases ==== | + | |
| - | The boat may be used entirely autonomously and be powered sustainably from the environment this can be depicted in the image below Storyboard I. It may also be used in an array of applications which are specific to the user, an example of these can be shown below in the Storyboard II. | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel2> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel3> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Below is a detailed list of the possible areas of application: | + | |
| - | - Research & Development | + | |
| - | - Sea Ice Movement | + | |
| - | - Water | + | |
| - | - Levels | + | |
| - | - Temperatures | + | |
| - | - Condition | + | |
| - | - Quality | + | |
| - | - Animals | + | |
| - | - Marine mammal monitoring | + | |
| - | - Ocean survey and mapping | + | |
| - | - Meteorological data collection | + | |
| - | - Health & Safety | + | |
| - | - Search and rescue (Both in natural and manmade disasters) | + | |
| - | - Deliver humanity aid | + | |
| - | - Security & Defence | + | |
| - | - Piracy | + | |
| - | - Terrorism | + | |
| - | - Drug interception | + | |
| - | - Environmental & sanctuaries enforcement | + | |
| - | - Waste disposal monitoring | + | |
| - | - Endangered species monitoring | + | |
| - | - Mine Wind farms | + | |
| - | - Energy Sources | + | |
| - | - Offshore | + | |
| - | - Wind farms | + | |
| - | - Oil rigs | + | |
| - | - Aquaculture | + | |
| - | - Aquatic plants | + | |
| - | - Farming | + | |
| - | - Fish | + | |
| - | - Crustaceans (Shrimp) | + | |
| - | - Molluscs (Mussels/ | + | |
| - | ==== 1.8 Project Planning ==== | + | |
| - | The initial timescale and scope can be seen below in the gantt chart format of the project. The entire project has been taken into consideration and milestones and markers have been left out to ensure the each task is completed on time and to a adequate level before submission. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel4> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe2> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 500px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Task ^ Responsible | + | |
| - | | Gantt Chart | Thies, Imre | | + | |
| - | | Leaflet | + | |
| - | | Research materials | + | |
| - | | State of the Art | Roberto, Marc, Jonny, Imre, Thies| | + | |
| - | | Project Management | + | |
| - | | Marketing Plan | Thies, Roberto | | + | |
| - | | Logbook | + | |
| - | | Sustainability | + | |
| - | | Ethical and Deontological Concerns | Thies | | + | |
| - | | Project Development | Roberto, Jonny, Marc, Thies | | + | |
| - | | Design | Marc | | + | |
| - | | Investigation | All | | + | |
| - | | Team Presentation | ::: | | + | |
| - | | Final Presentation | ::: | | + | |
| - | | Interim Report | ::: | | + | |
| - | | Final Report | ::: | | + | |
| - | | Development | ::: | | + | |
| - | | Functional Testing | ::: | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 1.9 Report Structure ==== | + | |
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe10> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box center centeralign 400px> | + | |
| - | ^ Task ^ Description ^ | + | |
| - | | Introduction | Consists of a team presentation and the motivation for choosing the project. Furthermore it states the objectives, planning, requirements and the problem which we face. | | + | |
| - | | State of the Art |Should give an overview of the mechanical principles and design basis for constructing a sail boat. | | + | |
| - | | Project Management |In this chapter we will outline the planning of the project ensuring a successful ending.| | + | |
| - | | Marketing Plan |This chapter will consist of an analysis of potential market segments to guarantee a long lasting and profitable surviving in the market of autonomous sailboats| | + | |
| - | | Eco-Efficiency Measures for Sustainability |We will try to manufacture Eco-efficient and sustainable for protecting the environment. Therefore we concentrate in this chapter in finding the best solutions for doing so. | | + | |
| - | | Ethical and Deontological Concerns |We want to operate ethically correct in terms of setting up a business and therefore we will analyse how to achieve this goal.| | + | |
| - | | Project Development |This part of the report will describe the development of our project throughout the semester.| | + | |
| - | | Conclusions |Summary of our learning outcomes and the final prototype. | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ===== 2. State of the Art ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 2.1 Introduction ==== | + | |
| - | In this chapter we are going to build the basis for understanding and proceeding with our project. We will point out the main ideas and concepts of sailboats and their design. Firstly we will concentrate on the different components of a sailboat such as the hull, mast, sail, keel and the rudder. This will be done by a comparison of the mainly used types and explanation of the principles how these components work on a sailboat. Later in this chapter we focused on the mechanical principles of a sailboat with its hydrodynamics, | + | |
| - | ==== 2.2 Boat Components ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.2.1 Hull === | + | |
| - | A hull is the watertight body of a ship or boat. Above the hull is the superstructure and/or deckhouse, where present. The line where the hull meets the water surface is called the waterline. | + | |
| - | The structure of the hull varies depending on the vessel type like flat or vee bottom these traditionally are monohulls, but multi-hull catamarans and trimarans are gaining popularity. Below is a table which represents a variety of hull types: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabel0> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 800px> | + | |
| - | ^ Type ^ Description ^ | + | |
| - | |**Flat Bottom Boat** {{ : | + | |
| - | |**Vee Bottom Boat** {{ : | + | |
| - | |**Round bottom boat** {{ : | + | |
| - | |**Multi Hull-Boat** {{ : | + | |
| - | |**Cathedral Hull Boat** {{ : | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | With this considerations, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel4> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.1.1 Hull Features == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The hull can be described by dimensional quantities as length, beam and draft, or non-dimensional like prismatic coefficient or slenderness ratio. These dimensional quantities are: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | - Length overall (LOA) the maximum length of the hull. | + | |
| - | - Length of waterline (LWL) & The length of the designed waterline (DWL). | + | |
| - | - Length between perpendiculars (LPP). The forward perpendicular (FP) is the forward end of the designed waterline, while the aft | + | |
| - | - Rated Length. The single most important parameter in any rating rule. Usually L is obtained by considering the fullness of the bow and stern sections in a more or less complex way. | + | |
| - | - Beam (B or Bmax). The maximum beam of the hull excluding fittings, like rubbing strake. | + | |
| - | - Beam of waterline (BWL), The maximum beam at the designed waterline. | + | |
| - | - Draft (T), The maximum draft of the boat when floating on the designed waterline. Tc is the draft of the hull without keel. | + | |
| - | - Depth, the vertical distance from the deepest point of the keel to the sheer line. Dc is without the keel. | + | |
| - | - Displacement, | + | |
| - | - Midship section. For ships, this section is located midway between the fore and aft perpendiculars. | + | |
| - | - Maximum Area section, the maximum area section is usually located behind the midship section. Its area is denoted Ax (Axc). | + | |
| - | - Prismatic coefficient (Cp). This is the ratio of the volume displacement and the maximum section area multiplied by the waterline length, Cp= Vc/ | + | |
| - | - Block coefficient (Cb), the volume displacement is now divided by the volume of a circumscribed block Cbc=Vc/ | + | |
| - | - Centre of buoyancy, The centre of gravity of the displaced volume of water. Its longitudinal and vertical positions are denoted by LCB and VCB respectively. | + | |
| - | - Centre of Gravity, The centre of gravity must be on the same vertical line as the centre of buoyancy. | + | |
| - | - Sheer line, The intersection between the deck and the topside. | + | |
| - | - Freeboard, The vertical distance between the sheer line and the waterline. | + | |
| - | - Scale factor, The scale factor is simply the ratio of a length at full scale to the corresponding length at model scale. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel5> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.1.2 Main Forces == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | When the hull is driving through the water, a resistance is developed. Under equilibrium conditions, when the boat is sailing at constant speed, in a given direction, the resistance has to be balanced by a driving force from the sails. Unfortunately, | + | |
| - | The heeling moment from the aerodynamic force is balanced by the righting moment from the buoyancy force and the weight. | + | |
| - | In the figure below the apparent wind direction is marked by a larger arrow. This is not the true wind direction, since the wind felt onboard the vessel is influenced by its speed through the air. The wind created by the boat speed is opposite to the arrow shown as boat speed in the figure. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel6> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.1.3 Resistances == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | At low speed the dominating component is the viscous resistance due to frictional forces between the hull and the water. The friction gives rise to eddie of different sizes, which contain energy left behind the hull in the wake. This component increases relatively slowly with speed, as opposed to the second component, the wave resistance, which occurs because the hull generates waves, transferring energy away. The sum of viscous and wave resistance components are the upright resistance. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.1.3.1 Viscous Resistance == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The molecular forces between the hull and the water are strong enough to stop the relative motion in the innermost water layer. The part of the flow within the hull and the point in which the water velocity have the ship speed is called boundary layer. Near the bow the flow within the boundary layer is smooth. The velocity in one layer is slightly larger than in the layer just inside. After a certain distance from the bow disturbances start to occur, and shortly thereafter the flow structure breaks down into a seemingly chaotic state: turbulence. The boundary layer is now characterised by eddies of different sizes and frequencies. The fluctuating velocities caused by eddies are, however considerably smaller than the mean velocity at all points in the boundary layer, so the flow is moving backwards. | + | |
| - | A special region can be distinguished in the inner part, called the viscous sublayer. It plays an important role, particularly in connection with surface roughness. In the viscous sublayer the flow is mainly laminar, but is sometimes disturbed by turbulent bursts, located at isolated spots, moving downstream with the flow. The region where the flow changes from laminar and turbulent is called the transition region and is very short. | + | |
| - | The viscous resistance can be divided in three parts: | + | |
| - | - The direct friction on the smooth surface | + | |
| - | - The pressure imbalance between the fore and after-bodies | + | |
| - | - The increase in friction due to surface roughness | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | R_f=0.5c_fρV_{e}^{2}S_w | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | where\begin{equation} | + | |
| - | c_f=\frac{0.075}{(Log(R_n)-2)^{2}} | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | In order to minimise the viscous resistance the hull should have a shape like a cod, but very slender. The Cp should be less than 0.5 and the LCB should be positioned in front of the midship section. | + | |
| - | We can assume the viscous pressure is 10% of the friction, which is a reasonable for our purposes. [(Eliasson2000)]. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.1.3.1 Wave Resistance == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | When a sailboat is in the water it creates a wave system with well-defined properties, called the Kelvin wave system, and is due to a traveling point disturbance on the water surface. | + | |
| - | There is a very simple relation between wavelength and traveling speed for surface waves. | + | |
| - | Since the wave system travels with the boat, at the same in the longitudinal direction, the length of the generated waves will depend on the nautical speed. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | wavespeed= \sqrt{\frac{gλ}{2π}} | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | where λ = wavelength measured in metres and g = gravity measured in metres per second squared. | + | |
| - | After this the wave resistance can be calculated with a coefficient table depending on water-plane area, displacement, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.2.2 Mast === | + | |
| - | The mast is the structural point at which connects the hull to the sail and can come under large amounts of stress and strain. These fluctuating values calls for extra design care, the masts holds forces caused by the wind attacking the foretriangle. This is the triangular area formed by the deck, foremast, and headstay of a sailing vessel, this area must not be greater than 1.6 times the area of the mainsail. The sail area is greater than the righting moment divided by 128 times the heeling arm. The heeling arm is the length difference between the center of buoyancy before and after heeling is caused and created a moment. | + | |
| - | - To calculate the rig we begin calculating the righting moment RM at 30° of heel in fully load condition. | + | |
| - | - From the formula we get the transverse load values of $T_{1}$, $T_{2}$, Thead, Tboom. This will be done in Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | T_{1} = R_m/a_{1} | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | \end{equation} where $a_{1}$=distance from hull and top of the mast in meters | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | T_{2} = R_m/a_{2} | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | \end{equation} where $a_{2}$ = the height of the geometrical centre of the reefed sail in meters | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | T_{head} = 0.40 T_{2} | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | T_{boom} = 0.33 T_{2} | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | - Calculate $T_{hu}$, $T_{hl}$, $T_{bu}$. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | T_{hu} = T_{head}d_1/ | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | T_{bu} = T_{boom}BD/ | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | - With this values calculate the dimensioning forces F1, F2, F3 depending on the number of spreaders, | + | |
| - | - Calculate the tensions of the shrouds in Load Case 1. Pd1, Pd2, Pv1, Pv2, Pd3. | + | |
| - | - Calculate the tensions of the shrouds in Load Case 2. Pd1, Pd2, Pv1, Pv2, Pd3. | + | |
| - | - Choosing the maximum value we get the dimensioning shroud forces : Pd1, Pd2, Pv1, Pv2, Pd3. | + | |
| - | - Get the dimensioning forces Pfo and Pa. | + | |
| - | - Knowing the material of the mast and the way it's stepped, | + | |
| - | - Calculate the required longitudinal moment of inertia Iy. | + | |
| - | - Entering values we get the requirements for the boom's section modulus. | + | |
| - | - Entering values we can pick the relevant shrouds, stays and rig component, and the dimensions. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | All the formulae are provided in the book " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.2.3 Sail === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | For the design of our boat we decided to use a rigid sail. One of the benefits of using a single sail is the easier control by a micro-controller. Additionally the increased controllability has the effect that the boat can safely stay for a long time alone offshore. As a result we searched for different rigid wing sails to understand the newest technologies and decide upon the most profitable for our boat. We have attached some examples of these sails below: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.3.1 The AC72 Catamaran (Oracle Team USA) == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The rigid wing sail of this catamaran is 130 ft (40 m) tall. Flaps on the trailing edge provide lift and consists of multiple segments to shape the wing in order to match the wind and control the power. [(Boats2013)] These class of catamarans " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel7> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.3.2 Wally Omer Wing (WOW) == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * High performance in terms of boat speed and heading angles. | + | |
| - | * Ease of handling by one person only, whatever its dimension is. | + | |
| - | * Lowering and reefing characteristics. | + | |
| - | * Reducing and simplifying the boat structures thus improving the interiors. | + | |
| - | * Simple, safe and reliable. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The WOW Sail increases the performance by 10-30 per cent in any condition, depending on the displacement of the boat: the lighter the boat is, the more efficient the wing sail is.[(WOW)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel8> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.3.3 X-Wing Wingsails == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | These sails are made of foam reinforced with sheet aluminium and plywood and are covered with clear heat-shrink plastic. The forward piece has an aluminium spar inside and a custom base with blocks for wing adjustment. The aft section has a T shaped control bar on the bottom that is used to trim the wing and a block beneath for the mainsheet. The top of the forward wing section has a knob toward the aft edge and the aft wing section has a tab with a hole that rests over the knob. It is secured with a pin and bolt at the bottom. | + | |
| - | The angle between the two wing sections is controlled by a single line rigged as a continuous loop. Release the cleats and pull on one side while easing the other and the aft wing section will move relative to the forward section, establishing the overall shape of the wingsail.[(SawMyFirstWingsailInPersonToday)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel9> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.3.4 Harbor Wing Composite == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The design was realised using a variety of composite materials selected to combat the harsh marine environment and minimise weight. High-modulus HR40 carbon fibre material was selected for the stub axle to provide maximum tensile stiffness. | + | |
| - | The wing sail and tail parts are each fabricated in one-piece, on male mandrels, using E-glass wet out with epoxy resin and are cored with either core-cell styrene acrylonitrile (SAN) foam or aluminium honeycomb. Aramid fibre was incorporated into the wing leading edges for added impact resistance, and some carbon fibre was used in locations that required extra stiffness. The bulkheads are flat carbon fibre/epoxy plate stock, which is CNC-machined to shape. The wing tail arms are simple carbon/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel10> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.3.5 How a rigid sail works? == | + | |
| - | A rigid wing sail is not a new concept and works very similar to many aeronautical designs and applications. The rigid wing follows an airfoil shaped design, when in operation air flows faster on one side of the airfoil, this produces a high pressure which is known as Lift. Lift is the upthrust of the sail which is used to propel the boat and maintain speed. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Air also flows on the underside of the airfoil although here it flows at a reduced speed to the top surface, therefore at a lower pressure which is known as Drag. Drag is the resisting force to lift, as the sail picks up speed and thus lift is increasing so must the drag value. A stabiliser flap can also be seen in Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel11> | + | |
| - | {{:: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.2.4 Keel === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The keel is an important aspect of any boat design, while not all boats have a keel it stabilises boats that do. It prevents side wind capsizing the boat and although this is an advantage it may also cause the boat to run a ground dependant on the depth of the water. Keels come in a variety of designs and weights and are usually custom to boats for their applications, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabel0> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 1600px> | + | |
| - | ^ Type ^ Description ^ Advantages ^ Disadvantages ^ | + | |
| - | |**Long or full keels** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**Encapsulated fin keels** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**Deep fin keels** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**Retractable keels** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**Twin or bilge keels** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**Keels with bulbs or wings** {{:: | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | [(SailboatKeels)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.4.1 | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The main requirement that our boat has to supply is to be as much stable as possible. The keel that we need for our design will be the one that provides the most floatability for the boat. This means the centre of gravity has to be very low in order to avoid that the boat capsizes. To achieve this there are two different ways. The first one is designing a deep keel which works against the forces that attack at the sail and on the other hand it lowers the centre of gravity which increases the buoyancy. The biggest disadvantage of a deep keel is that the boat will have limitations when sailing near the coast line. The second option is to put weight at the end of the keel. This lowers the centre of gravity without being too deep and improves the possibility to navigate everywhere. Lastly we have to mention that it is really important to not focus too much on the stability and weight of the boat because it will slow the boat down and also decrease its manoeuvrability. Summing up our investigations we come to the conclusion that a bulb keel would be the best design of our boat. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.2.5 Rudder === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Usually symmetrical shapes for the rudder are used to ensure when going straight, that there are no pressure differences between the two sides. If we go with the rudder at a certain angle there will be an asymmetric profile, this angle between rudder and fluid flow is called angle of attack. If we assume a fluid that flows at constant velocity that collides with the rudder, we firstly have two points to mention. These are the stagnation points where the velocity of the fluid is zero. The location of these points depend of the foil section and angle of attack in respect to the flow. To illustrate this you can see these stagnation points "S 1" and "S 2" in the following figure. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel12> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | However, when sailing at higher velocities the flow at the trailing edge of the rudder will break away and cause a vortex to arise. This vortex will be between the stagnation point and the trailing edge. The rotation of the vortex will be always against the rotation that develops around the hull of the boat and depending on the viscous forces that are involved in this process. By holding a certain angle of attack, the vortex will break away and the stagnation point of "S 2" will move towards the trailing edge. By doing so the velocity differences of the upper and lower stream around the rudder are equalised at this point. There will be no more vortex and the stable flow will cause a lifting force. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel13> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel14> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | This lift force consists of two forces. One that is trying to move the boat in a certain direction and one that slows the boat down, due to acting backwards. The necessary physical basis for creating a lift is, that the upper stream of the fluid particles have to be faster that the ones that flow over the lover surface in order to reach the trailing edge at the same time. Furthermore we have to state that the higher the aspect ratio rudder is, the greater will be the lift created and faster the respond to a change in the angle of attack. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Another force to mention, that effects the performance of the rudder is called drag. Form drag always occurs when a fluid passes a solid object, as a resistance in the flow. This resistance is highly dependent on the shape of the rudder and will be minimised the thinner and smaller the rudder is. Apart from the form drag, we have skin friction. This is caused by surface irregularities of the rudder that slow down the flow of the fluid. To generate a smooth flow, called laminar flow, it is highly deepened on the angle of attack, the skin friction, shape of the rudder, velocity and the density of the fluid. At a certain point the flow will become turbulent which effects the lift created. The point at which the flow becomes turbulent is called transition point and is caused by a slow down in the velocity of the fluid flow around the rudder. The fluid will only accelerate until the suction point and loses momentum along its way. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel15> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Summing up the facts, we can state that the longer the laminar flow can be held, the less drag is caused. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel16> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabel0> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 800px> | + | |
| - | ^ Type ^ Description ^ | + | |
| - | |**Full Keel Rudder** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**Spade Rudder** {{:: spade_rudder.jpg? | + | |
| - | |**Skeg-Mounted Rudder** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**Outboard Rudder** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**Michalak Kickup Rudder** {{:: | + | |
| - | |**„Sandwich“ Kickup Rudder** {{:: | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.5.1 Rudder Conclusion == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | As a conclusion about the rudder design we want to use a symmetric spade rudder, that is designed after the principe of " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel17> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 2.3 Mechanical Principles ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.3.1 Hydrostatics | + | |
| - | Hydrostatics considers the conditions of fluids in an equilibrium state, thus when fluid velocity is equal to zero. In these conditions the submerged surface area of the hull is put throughout to different pressures which are depended on the depth and the weight of the fluid. We will account the value of gravity as 9.807m/s^2. A special case occurs while dealing with a hydrostatic condition, the acceleration and viscous terms are ignored, and pressure is only dependent on gravity and density due to zero flow or flow at constant velocity. The boat hull has forces applied from above and below. The force from above is gravity forcing the boat down and vice versa from below is the force in an upwards direction is the upthrust created by a higher pressure at a greater depth and finally the weight of the boat is a factor. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The equilibrium of a boat can be analysed in two steps. Firstly to understand the equilibrium in water, we describe the static equilibrium and from there onwards we will show what dynamic equilibrium means in relation to our autonomous sailboat. The equation has defined | + | |
| - | //"Any object, wholly or partially immersed in a fluid, is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object."// | + | |
| - | [(Pickover2008)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.3.2.1 Buoyancy == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Archimedes' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | M \times g = V_{total}\times \rho_{boat}\times g = V_{fluid}\times\rho_{fluid}\times g\\ | + | |
| - | V_{total}\times\rho_{boat} = V_{fluid}\times\rho_{fluid} \\ | + | |
| - | \frac{V_{total}}{V_{fluid}} = \frac{\rho_{fluid}}{\rho_{boat}} \\ | + | |
| - | \rho_{fluid} {>} \rho_{boat} | + | |
| - | \label{eq: | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | \\ In this equation M is the mass of the boat in kg, g is the gravity in $m/s^2$, V is Volume in $m^3$, $\rho$ is the density in $kg/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To explain this equation we know that the weight of the boat is a downwards force which acts at the centre of mass. Collinear to this force is the force of buoyancy acting upwards on the centre of buoyancy. The mass of the boat is equal to its total volume times the mean density of the boat times the gravity. This part of the equation has to be equal to the volume of the displaced water by the boat times the density of the water times gravity. It is important to mention that the density of the boat is the mean of all different materials used. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | For a floating of the boat the density of water has to be always greater than the respective density of the boat to ensure the equation equals 0. If this is not the case the boat will sink. If you imagine to put some weight unevenly on one side of the boat, the boat will sink deeper on one side, which will cause an increase in buoyancy force and equilibrium is retained. The buoyancy force will chance because the centre of buoyancy is changing and this causes a greater moment. The condition in which the boat always moves back to is called stable equilibrium and the movement is called righting moment or positive stability moment.[(Fossati2009)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Therefore, Archimedes' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel18> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | **Water Environment Density and Specific Weight** | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In our circumstances the boat must be able to be deployed in any environment and for this all water environments must be considered. Due to liquids being nearly incompressible we can neglect the variation in density and assume it a constant in hydrostatic calculations. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel0> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | |Environment|Average Density (kg/m3) |Specific Weight (N/m3)| | + | |
| - | |Sea Water |1020–1029 | + | |
| - | |Water | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.3.2 Stability == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | After understanding the basics of static equilibrium we now want to focus on forces that we have to take in consideration in an actual environment. Firstly there are forces that could cause a moment along the longitudinal x axis of the boat. This might be caused by weights unevenly added to one side of the boat or i.e. due to wind and waves. The force(s) will result in a heel of the boat and it will lose its static equilibrium. If the sum of the moments become zero, the boat will retain equilibrium at this angle. Furthermore the centre of buoyancy will change, due to a change of the mass of the boat under water. See figures: 19 and 20 | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel19> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel20> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In conclusion we can say there is equilibrium if the forces G and B are equal to zero and the moments occurring along the x-, y-and z axis are zero too. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.2.3.3 Centre of Gravity == | + | |
| - | Next we want to point out the importance of the centre of mass being as low as possible compared to the centre of buoyancy in case of our boat. This refers to the last paragraph about the moments. It is needed to ensure stability and not capsizing as the target is to project a boat that fulfils its long term missions offshore. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | If we compare the two possibilities: | + | |
| - | In Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel21> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | And in Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel22> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | If we now imagine the possibility in Figure 23 that the centre of gravity is above the centre of buoyancy and the boat will be put under side forces. This will undoubtedly cause that the boat will start to heel as well. At position c) we can still see that the angle of heeling is not big enough so the boat still tends to go back in its original position. If the forces become bigger and situation d) is present, we can see that both centres are in a collinear line. In this position equilibrium is retained again. At this position it is nearly impossible to get the boat back in the sailing position. After this position, with an increasing side force, the next position e) is only temporal. Pretty quickly the boat will lie upside down in the water, see position f).[(Fossati2009)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel23> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Underlining this movement we can see in the following figure two graphs. Number one displays the situation when the centre of buoyancy is above the centre of mass/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel24> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | This Figure shows, that the second option is very unstable and tends to capsize faster than the first option. In fact if the $R_m$ is crossing the y axis, than the centre of mass and the centre of buoyancy are collinear. As shown in the graphs, after option 2 has crossed the y axis, the moment of resistance is negative. That means the boat has no resistance when totally capsizing it actually enhances turning upside down. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To explain why a boat is capsizing we need to define | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The significant effect of the metacentre is that if it is above the centre of gravity, the momentum will righten the boat to its former stable upright position. If the metacentre is below the centre of gravity the momentum will result in the capsize of the boat.[(FloatYourBoat)] As shown in Figure X the point of the metacentre is at the intersection of the line of BG and the line of the new centre of buoyancy B´. As the rightening arm, the distance from G to Z is getting bigger, the larger becomes the distance from G (centre of gravity) to M (metric centre). For heeling angles not greater than 10 degrees the metacentre remains near constant. The distance of G to M at such small angles is called the metacentric height.[(PracticalShipProduction)] | + | |
| - | The closer the metacentre is to the centre of gravity, the ship will change its stable equilibrium to a neutral equilibrium. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel25> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel26> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.3.2 Aerodynamics | + | |
| - | The sail is the sustainable driving force of the boat, through the conservation of motion of wind to the sail. The sail controls many aspects of the boat thus vital in the design to ensure correct operation, balance and stability, while controlling both velocity and direction. Primarily the aerodynamic forces apply from differences in air pressure causing normal stress which act perpendicular to the sail and air viscosity which causes a parallel shear stress on the entire sail surface. The boat is subjected to six degrees of freedom listed in the next section. The sail is subjected to lift and drag, shown in the figure below: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel27> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | The image shows indicates all forces applied to a symmetrical section which acts as a wing-sail. It can operate for angles of attack ranging from 0-90o, where lift and drag propel the boat as air pressures pass the winged section. This requires high levels of accuracy from the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) now formally known as NASA, was the leading aeronautics experts who published wind tunnel analysis' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The NACA wings vary in size and geometry through the years of testing, has distinguished sizes by allocating numbers. NACA ****, if the first two digits 00 indicate the aerofoil is symmetrical and the last two, for example 12, or 12% indicates the maximum thickness of the wing 15% behind the nose. These can vary from 6% to +24%. These NACA aerofoils will vary in our selection for the final design as testing and calculations must be carried out before finalising a stable wing for the boat. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | These aerofoils produce a large quantity of drag but conversely a larger lift coefficient, | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel28> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | The graph shows a rise and fall of the lift coefficient to a maximum angle of attack up to 16 degrees. This wing gives values of 3 different Reynolds numbers for each section of the wing due to roughness. In this area the wing has an optimum effectiveness at 16 degrees. Although wing sails can operate when it is deeply stalled, the coefficient of lift vs. angle of attack for the range 0 to 90 degrees. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To ensure aerodynamic stability the wing must move freely in the required direction, an additional symmetrical wing stabiliser can be installed on the wing. This allows the wing to balance and stabilise is wind direction and wing orientation changes. The aerodynamic forces are exerted onto the pivots and this brings two forces and moments into existence. These forces must have equilibrium with the stabiliser providing an upward force to balance the combined moments on the wing and on itself and to do this it must make an angle of attack in the same direction as that of the wing. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The wing and control vane in our circumstance the rudder is capable of producing a force to drive the boat and is simple to switch to change tacks. If mounted on ball races it can respond to slow changes in wind direction. It is then a wing-sail. The wind-sail interacts with the wind to produce lift and drag to drive the boat as the orientation can be changed to accommodate wind forces applied, the wing-sail is much less cumbersome in comparison to a soft sail for our design. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | It is possible to calculate the force applied on a wing-sail at any point of sailing if the ratio of lift to drag is assumed, the effect of this ratio can be shown below: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | ratio = {{Lift} \over {Drag}} = {L \over D} = {{cl} \over {cd}} = {1 \over {\tan (\alpha)}} = {d \over h} = {{distance} \over {height}} | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | It can be seen that lift and drag are both separate equations, firstly the lift coefficient (Cl) and secondly drag coefficient (Cd) are both determined on complex dependencies of shape, inclination, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Cl = {{2L} \over {\rho{{\rm{V}}^2}{\rm{A}}}} | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | \\ In this equation L is the lift of the airfoil in ??, $\rho$ is the density in $kg/m^3$, A is area in $m^2$, V is the volume in $m^3$.\\ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Cd = {D \over {\rho A {{{V^2}} \over 2}}} | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | \\ In this equation D is the drag of the airfoil in ??, $\rho$ is the density in $kg/m^3$, A is area in $m^2$, V is the volume in $m^3$.\\ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | These calculations are used to find the driving force of the boat which can be incorporated into the next section of dynamic equilibrium, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.3.3 Dynamic Equilibrium | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | After understanding what equilibrium means in terms of a vessel and what the forces are that prevent a vessel from capsizing, we now have to analyse the equilibrium when wind, currents and tides etc. are taking influence on the sailboat. Whenever the boat is in motion and other external forces are influencing the stability of the boat and it is preserving a point of equilibrium, | + | |
| - | If you imagine a boat in the sea when it gets windy and the waves are rising, you actually see that boat rather moving along all directions. It tends to go upwards and downwards, from left to right. Putting that movements into description we can define them as following: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel29> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | So what we can state is that the dynamic forces arise from the relative motion of the boat such as wind and water. Firstly we have the force of the wind which will be called $F_{A}$ in Figure 32. This force applies directly to a point called centre of the sail plan or aerodynamic centre of effort. To make it easier, we say that the centre is the geometrical centre of the sail, which is not always correct because it highly depends on the direction of wind and the trim of the sail. There are lots of variables to take into consideration. The force has a big component in the direction perpendicular to the wind direction and a small component towards the wind direction.[(Fossati2009)]] Apart from the aerodynamic forces we have the hydrodynamic forces. These forces occur under the water and are called $F_{i}$ in Figure 32. $F_{i}$ applies to the centre of lateral resistance. For simplify reasons it is in the centre of the longitudinal centre of the submerged part of the boat. If we imagine the boat in motion in water, it the centre of lateral resistance will depend on many variables i.e. the position of the rudder and trim of the sail. $V_{A}$ is the wind speed at and acting angle of ß. This is the course which the sailboat would intend to sail. The speed of the boat is assumed to be $V_{S}$. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel30> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The angle of the sail has the purpose to generate the biggest lift and minimise the drag of the boat, depending on the wind speed and angle. When combining the lift and drag force you get the total aerodynamic force as shown in Figure 32. | + | |
| - | The total aerodynamic force can be divided into the driving force $F_{M}$ and the aerodynamic side force $F_{LAT}$. This force $F_{Lat}$ is the heeling force. To get equilibrium the hull has to generate an equal force in opposite direction. To get this we can use the rudder and create an angle of attack (Lambda). In conclusion to the dynamic equilibrium we have the forces of the aerodynamic part, the hydrodynamic and the forces acting on the centre of gravity and centre of buoyancy. To create an overall dynamic equilibrium we have to ensure that: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | \sum_{}F_x=0~ | + | |
| - | \sum_{}F_y=0~ | + | |
| - | \sum_{}F_z=0~ | + | |
| - | \sum_{}M_x=0~ | + | |
| - | \sum_{}M_y=0~ | + | |
| - | \sum_{}M_z=0 | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | In this equation F refers to the forces in x-,y- and z axis and M refer to the moment in the axis as mentioned previously in this chapter. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | After defining the mechanical principles, we will now continue with the electrical devices that we think have to be considered to put into the boat to collect the necessary data. These devices are important to control the sail at the end and calculate the best angle to sail, with all environmental influences taking into consideration. | + | |
| - | ==== 2.4 Optimal Sail Position ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To start off by explaining the best positions for sailing, we want to define the different possible sailing directions. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel31> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | As you can see in Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | Another position of the boat can be „close hauled“ which means that the sailing boat is sailing as close as possible to the „No Sailing Zone“. This sailing direction is also called „upwind“. | + | |
| - | Next there is reaching which is travelling perpendicular to the wind. Whenever you are travelling toward the wind it is called „close reach“ whereas going away from the wind direction is „broad reach“. As soon as you sail at a right angle towards the wind it is called „beam reach“. Lastly if the wind is coming directly from behind you are „running downwind“. [(TheCompleteYachtmaster)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | For analysing the best sail trim we can first state that there are three main types of wind. First there is the boat wind. This is the wind that you can feel when you are for example motoring through water with now wind to sail. This will always go strait from the bow to the stern when going forward. The next type of wind is the true wind. To find the direction of the true wind you can look for flags on buoys, boats at anchor or wind waves. The third type of wind is apparent wind, which is the combined boat wind and true wind. It lies between the two other types of wind and the main sheet trimmer should trim the main sail parallel to the apparent wind to give a good lift and drive. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel32> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | As the wind direction is very likely to change and can be changed into a virtually infinite number of sail positions, we use a smaller additional wing called „tail“, that is mounted just behind the main wing. Aircrafts for example also use a tail to control the exact angle of attack of its wings. In the same way our tail on the wing sail system is able to control the thrust obtained from the wind and will automatically take into account any changes in wind direction. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To get an idea of the boat behaviour and influence of the wind you do a polar diagram. In a polar diagram the maximum speed of the boat for every course relative to the wind direction is plotted for different wind speeds. To get a first impression of the boat behaviour we used the polar diagram of the „ASV Roboat“ that has been tested on the Lake Ontario, Canada in a 7 hours test with wind angles from 0 to 180degrees and a wind speed up to 8 m/s. This will help us to get an idea for the speed prediction because it is quiet similar from its dimensions to our boat. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel33> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | As you can see the speed of the boat drops to zero as it is getting closer to the „No Sailing Zone“ and also the „No Sailing Zone“ is decreasing as the wind speed increases. | + | |
| - | Our approach to the optimal wing position is that the wing flies at a constant angle of attack to the apparent wind.That is, if the hull were held fixed, the wing would fly at a constant angle of attack relative to the true wind, and that angle of attack would be determined uniquely by the angle of the tails. This will allow us to get the optimal angle to the wing of the wing-sail automatically by adjusting the tails. As we already pointed out the aerodynamic forces on the sail and that the apparent wind is a vector resulting from the true wind force and the velocity of the boat we come to the following figures and ideas that are related to the scientific article [(EXPERIMENTALAERODYNAMICPERFORMANCE)] . | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel34> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Top left: beating up wind, angles for a port tack (true wind from the forward left) | + | |
| - | * Top right: reaching across wind, port reach (true wind from the left side) | + | |
| - | * Bottom: running down wind, port run (true wind from the left rear) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | To start with the first figure beating up wind we can state that the sail and tails are to be stationary at an angle of 0 degrees. In this case the boat will stop and not moving forward by the wind force. If you want to go forward you need to move the tails now to an angle of $-\delta_{t}$ | + | |
| - | As the boat moves forward the apparent wind will move towards the front. When this is happening the tail will have to keep the wing sail at a constant angle of attack repeating the apparent wind. | + | |
| - | In the second Figure we can see the same behaviour as in the first, that the tail will have to move at an angle of $-\delta_{t}$ towards the wind, creating a movement of the main sail and thus creating a velocity and also a movement of the apparent wind towards the bow of the boat. | + | |
| - | In the last Figure we can see the same process as in the previous figures only that the tail will be in front of the boat. Nevertheless the angle of attack of the wing sail will remain constant. If the wind would now come from the opposite side of the boat (starboard) the angles and movements will only be mirrored at the new angle $\delta_{t}$. [(EXPERIMENTALAERODYNAMICPERFORMANCE)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Obstacle Protection | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Obstacle Protection is another part that has a great influence on the sail position. The basis for the obstacle protection is the polar diagram. Due to the fact that the diagram tells you the maximum speed possible at a given wind speed and sail angle towards the wind, you can reduce the speed if obstacles are sensed in the surrounding area of the boat. In the following Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel35> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 2.5 Electrical Devices ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.5.1 Batteries === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Introduction: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel1> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 1000px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Picture ^ Voltage (V) ^ Energy Density (Wh/kg) ^ Lifespan (years) //one charge/ | + | |
| - | |**Lead Acid** {{: | + | |
| - | |**Ni-Cd** {{: | + | |
| - | |**Li-Ion** {{: | + | |
| - | |**Li-Poly** {{: | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | **Conclusion: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.5.2 Solar Panel === | + | |
| - | **Introduction: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel2> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 650px center> | + | |
| - | ^ ^ Picture ^ Average efficiency ^ Best efficiency ^ Warranty ^ Price ^ Additional details ^ | + | |
| - | |Amorphous | + | |
| - | |Polycrystalline|{{: | + | |
| - | |Mono-crystalline|{{: | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | **Conclusion: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.5.3 Sensors === | + | |
| - | **Introduction: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.5.3.1 Wind Sensor == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Introduction: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel3> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 650px center> | + | |
| - | ^ ^ Picture ^ Measurement method ^ Remarks ^ | + | |
| - | |Cup anemometer | + | |
| - | |Propeller vane anemometer|{{: | + | |
| - | |Sonic anemometer | + | |
| - | |AMS AS504X | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Conclusion: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <figure flabel36> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | <figure flabel37> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.5.3.2 GPS Receiver == | + | |
| - | **Introduction: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel4> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 600px center> | + | |
| - | ^ ^Pictures^Sensitivity^Supply Voltage ^Power consumption ^Accuracy ^Price^ | + | |
| - | |A1084-A | + | |
| - | |u-blox LEA-6H | + | |
| - | |Adafruit Ultimate GPS Breakout|{{: | + | |
| - | |SparkFun Venus GPS |{{: | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.5.3.3 Compass Sensor == | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Introduction: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | <figure flabel38> | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | //Honeywell HMC5883L:// Triple Axis Compass Magnetometer Sensor Module for Arduino. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Features and benefits: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | • 3-Axis Magnetoresistive Sensors | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | • Includes 12 bit ADC converter | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | • Built in self-test | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | • Low Voltage Operations (2.16 to 3.6 V) and Low Power Consumption (100 μA) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | • Sensors Can Be Used in Strong Magnetic Field Environments with a 1° to 2° Degree Compass Heading Accuracy | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | • Compatible for Battery Powered Applications | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | • Price: ~ €3 | + | |
| - | ==== 2.6 Related Work ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.6.1 Projects === | + | |
| - | ==2.6.1.1 ASV Roboat == | + | |
| - | The ASV Roboat is a nearly 4 meter long boat with a 60 kg keel ballast to achieve that it is unsinkable. In the year 2008 the ASV ' | + | |
| - | It has a 800 MHz/512 MB Mini-ITX computer controlling and the software uses Java and C++. Furthermore it has GPS data for the positioning and can estimate the speed of the boat. Also on board there are sensors like ultrasonic wind speed and direction data, tilt-compensated compass, humidity, air and water temperature and water depth. Furthermore the boat has a three-stage communication system combining WLAN, UMTS/GPRS and an IRIDIUM satellite communication system for navigation and tracking. | + | |
| - | For the energy supply they added solar panels which makes the boat mostly energy independent. As a backup they used a direct methanol fuel cell. [(ASVRoboat)] | + | |
| - | The battery bank, solar panels providing up to 285 W of power, a direct methanol fuel cell delivering 65 W for backup power.The sail area of mainsail and foresail together is 4.5 $m^2$. [(ASVRoboat)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This project of the ASV Roboat is the closest compared to our project this semester. As their approach was to build an unsinkable boat as well and also won championships with it, we can orientate our project along this boat. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel39> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.6.1.2 Saildrone == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Saildrone uses basic sailing principles, but combines state-of-the-art carbon fibre composites with proficient aero- and hydro dynamics to create a robust and efficient sailing boat. | + | |
| - | The Saildrone vehicle is powered by a solid, freely rotating wing that is controlled by a tail. This concept was evolved over a ten year period for the Greenbird project by Richard Jenkins, Saildrone Inc.'s CEO and co-founder. Greenbird currently holds the world speed record for wind-powered vehicles at 126.2 mph. | + | |
| - | The Saildrone vehicle is constructed from carbon fibre to create an extremely strong and durable structure. While delicate in appearance, the vehicle is engineered to be fully submerged and rolled in extreme waves. | + | |
| - | The hydrodynamic design is a hybrid, combining the best features of mono- and multi-hulls. The result is a self-righting platform, that also benefits from high righting moments for speed and wave piercing capabilities to reduce pitching and energy absorption from waves. | + | |
| - | The boat is controlled by electronics package that is not only incredibly durable and robust, but has low power consumption. [(Saildrone)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel40> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.6.1.3 FASt == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | FASt is a 2.5 m LOA (length overall) autonomous sailing boat. The design is inspired in the hull shape of offshore racing sailing boats, with a deep keel and twin rudders. The deck was kept flat to facilitate the installation of hardware, solar panel and water tight connectors for attaching external instrumentation. | + | |
| - | The hull was built with epoxy resin and a sandwich of carbon fibre, honey comb core and fibre glass. The keel was laminated with a carbon fibre skin around a polyurethane foam and a hard wood core. A 20 kg lead ballast was built from sheets of lead glued with epoxy and covered with a fibreglass skin. | + | |
| - | The keel is attached to the hull by locking it in a central keel box across the hull. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel41> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 2.6.1.4 ASN Datamaran == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Autonomous Marine System delivers a global platform for ocean observation using intelligent sensor networks powered by Datamaran. Datamaran is a catamaran with a length of 2,5 meters, a width of 1,7 m, a mast height of 2,3 m and a mass of 85 kg with full payload. For the communication system it has an Iridium modem, a Cellular networks for low cost / high bandwidth close to shore. Datamaran has two types of propellers: the wind with a self-trimming rigid wing sail, and an electric propeller available for tight manoeuvring and added space.[(Datamaran)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Interesting in this project is the rigid wing sail and its dimension, from which we can get ideas. Also the positions of the sensors are well chosen, but we cannot confront with our prototype because Datamaran is multi-hull and the available surface is different from our mono-hull boat. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel42> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 2.6.2 Platforms === | + | |
| - | After comparing related work in terms of the boat we have investigated and the related platforms which were installed to control the autonomous component selection of our design. These components can vary as seen in section **2.5 Electrical**, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==2.6.2.1 Raspberry Pi == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel43> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==2.6.2.2 HMI/PSC & CAN Bus == | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel44> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel45> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==2.6.2.3 ARRTOO == | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel46> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==2.5.2.4 ATIRMA == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel47> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==2.6.3 High Level Control Architecture & Logarithms | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel48> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel49> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 2.7 Conclusion ==== | + | |
| - | There is great deal of detail in this section which has been quantified and specified to find solutions for our boat design, it will be further developed in **7.0 Project Development** section. The State of the Art has allowed us to derive the best possible design for the boats requirements, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Sailboat | + | |
| - | * Hull => Vee/Rounded bottom | + | |
| - | * Keel => Bulb keel | + | |
| - | * Rudder => Spade rudder | + | |
| - | * Wing-sail => Airfoil NACA 0012 | + | |
| - | * System | + | |
| - | * Sensors | + | |
| - | * Wind => AMS AS504X Encoders | + | |
| - | * Compass => Honeywell HMC5883L | + | |
| - | * GPS => | + | |
| - | * Battery => Li-ion | + | |
| - | * Solar Panel => Polycrystalline solar cell | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Although some of these are not getting taken into consideration it is vital to highlight the possible components for future upgrades which is dependant on product improvement and the client. The system that we will adopt on our boat is a wind, battery and solar panel. These components will allow the sailboat to function at he simplest level on its own accordance. The next chapter will see our skills in project management put to the test from task allocation to budgeting, where several of these products will be scrutinised and removed according to costs. The aim is to manage our valuable time and resources over the entire duration of the project. | + | |
| - | ===== 3. Project Management ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 3.1 Scope ==== | + | |
| - | The scope for our project is an autonomous monitoring system which is deployed for extensive periods of time in aquatic environments. The project concentration will be solely lie in the development of a functioning sailboat for the autonomous system platform. The boat will be deployed in several environments, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Fully sustainable, | + | |
| - | * Complete user manual. | + | |
| - | * Safety for both user and animal/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In addition, the following deliverables have to be developed, documenting the project´s process and achievements: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The user manual will incorporate the use of the hull and sail, as our main focus is on this although the finished product will a fully functioning autonomous monitoring system so this must be taken into full consideration when the boat is being designed. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The prototype must succeed in all requirements and functionalities to be deemed successful, allowing it to work and be controlled unmanned is not our objective but as stated before all considerations must be made for this factor. The detailed technical requirements towards the prototype are listed in section **1.5 Requirements**. It is tried to fully comply with the requirements during chapter **7.0 Project Development**. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The WBS of the project can be seen below, this is subcatagorises the project deliverables allowing the customer to see the end goals and objectives over the timescale. This hierarchal diagram shows all measures that must be addressed for project succession. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabe50> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The way we organized ourselves around the various deliverables and tasks can be seen in the subchapter **3.2 Time**, in the planning part and briefly in **Table 3** | + | |
| - | ==== 3.2 Time ==== | + | |
| - | Time management is a key matter for the project. It accounts for the deliverables to the clients and incorporates the entire team to achieve the end goal. Shown below the deadlines for deliverables, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabe11> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | ^ Deliverables | + | |
| - | | Hand in list of materials | + | |
| - | | Upload interim report and presentation | + | |
| - | | Interim presentation | + | |
| - | | Upload the Final Report, Presentation, | + | |
| - | | Final Presentation, | + | |
| - | | Make final corrections to the report and wiki, according to received feedback | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | In addition to these deadlines the team has prepared additional deliverables for our client: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabe12> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ^ Deliverables | + | |
| - | | Storyboard | + | |
| - | | 3D Computer Model | 23-03-2015 | + | |
| - | | Styrofoam Model | 11-05-2015 | + | |
| - | | Prototype/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Based on these deadline tables, an outline can be portrayed for the quantity of work must be done for the project. The work assignments have been specified and categorised according to the deadline and durations of the deliverables. These tasks are subject to change as computing an accurate plan for such a long duration is demanding, therefore the Gantt chart has been repeatedly revised as the project proceeded. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabe51> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 3.3 Cost ==== | + | |
| - | Controlling the project budget is vital for the success or failure, this parameter must be strictly monitored throughout the project. The budget for this project is 500 € and is provided by LSA. The project includes direct and indirect costs, shown below: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * **Direct** – The model and prototype expenses through materials, these will be researched and chosen strictly to maintain a large safety margin and quality design. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * **Indirect** – EPS cover these working condition costs which incorporate facilities and staff such as technicians, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The list of materials is yet to be chosen due to a delay our tasks due to calculation considerations yet to be made in the project. Although the materials have not been selected a projected value of 80 € has been selected and a projected value for the prototype is ranged between 240 €-280 €. This equates to the total approximated amount of money required for materials is at 360 €. This allows for a safety margin of 120 € to be spend on unexpected materials. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel52> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel53> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel54> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 3.4 Quality ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Quality is essential in throughout a products life cycle, from planning to manufacture it contributes several variables to the satisfaction of customers, stockholder, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 3.4.1 Process quality ==== | + | |
| - | * It begins with innovative designs that we will find the basis of in ISO 12215:2002. The ISO standards ensure a quality product on an international platform this reduces cost and allows the product to enter new markets overseas. Quality control measures will be implemented, | + | |
| - | * Group meetings will take place on regular occasions to address any problems that arise over the coming months of the project from over and under allocated tasks to cost management problems. | + | |
| - | * Supervisor meetings will also take place weekly on Thursdays. During these meetings, we will provide the supervisors with the newest achievements on the project and on the other hand we will get support when needed. This will ensure that our product will at the end be a fully functional deliverable for our client that meets an adequate standard of engineering. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 3.4.2 Product quality ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Testing the products in the functional tests will certify and validate the quality for the customer and the market. Furthermore it will verify the properly done design and usability in different water bodies. The testing procedure will commence on going through the product development. All testing circumstances will be strictly monitored to guarantee accurate results and figures. The testing stage will either confirm or de-confirm if the product was successful in completing all requirements for the client while finding solutions to these requirements. | + | |
| - | * Costumer and client opinion about product quality is another aspect of quality that will have a profound influence on our work. The final product has to meet at the end the needs of potential customers as analysed in the marketing chapter but also the requirements set by our client at the beginning of the semester. To ensure the satisfaction of the client we must show him on regular basis our work and design ideas and wait for his ok to proceed. It is essential to meet in the first place the needs of our client and after this of future potential customers as Eduardo Silva is providing the money. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 3.5 People ==== | + | |
| - | The academically integrated and international Team 5 opted for allocation and delegation of tasks suited to individual strengths within the project. The team members are shown below, followed by a task allocation list: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | **Roberto Giordano** => **Gizem Ozturk** => **Gary Jonathan Rabone** => **Marc Navarrete Hill** => **Imre Asztalos** => **Thies Gunther**\\ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabe55> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | The work distribution has been allocated singularly, pairs and in some circumstances the entire team due to severity of the task. The severity of the task is dependant on the work load and the deadline date. Distributing these tasks among several members of the team will allow the team to make deadlines and if additional assistance is required members can be shifted to complete all tasks on time. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We enclose in this section the Role and Responsibly Assignment Matrix, also called RACI matrix. | + | |
| - | The RACI matrix specifies the type of relationship between the resource and the activity : Responsible , Accountable , Consulted , Informed . With this tool you see " who does what " within an organisation . | + | |
| - | The matrix assets / resources , or the RACI matrix , can be used for the modelling of business processes of the base. Introducing a sequence of activities and crossing them with the actors of the process , you can represent a flow chart of the procedure to be followed . | + | |
| - | * ' | + | |
| - | * ' | + | |
| - | * ' | + | |
| - | * ' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel56> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel57> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 3.6 Communications ==== | + | |
| - | Communication in team work conditions can define success or failure from oral, written and nonverbal communication, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabe58> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(1)** Primarily our communication is orally, during face-to-face meetings where agendas and targets are clearly highlighted as topics of interest. In these circumstances healthy discussions and debates can take place and this usually overruns the meeting times but a clear goal has been achieved afterwards. Meetings take place in ISEP facilities and also in other locations pending to members attendance. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | As a group, Team 5 attend weekly meetings with the EPS supervisors. Preparation is required for the meetings, usually questions which are uploaded prior to the meeting time. One member of the team is selected as the speaker to ask these questions to the supervisors. The meeting is recorded via audio and written, later these are collated into the group logbook. Post meeting discussions can be arranged if either the meeting overruns or questions have yet to be answered. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(2)** Written communication is used mainly in unsocial hours, when team members or advisors are unable to meet and must contact over the following platforms, from the EPS standpoint and for our clients LSA. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(3)** Finally, nonverbal communication is used mainly in team meetings where a team members is confident and trust in each member as it is an obligation to complete the tasks for each deadline. This is usually conveyed in group meetings when member are disconnected from the matter at hand. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * **Communication Table** | + | |
| - | <table tlabe14> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ^ What ^ Who ^ How ^ When ^ Why ^ To whom ^ Encode/ | + | |
| - | | Interim Presentation | + | |
| - | | Weekly team meeting | + | |
| - | | Final Report | + | |
| - | | Progress to client | + | |
| - | | Calculations and design proposals to Fernando | + | |
| - | | Weekly supervisor meeting | + | |
| - | | Changes in the project | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 3.7 Risk ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Risk management is the act or practice of dealing with risk. It includes planning, identifying, | + | |
| - | By Harold R. Kerzner) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Below are the possible risk factors we might face during our project: | + | |
| - | <table tlabe16> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | ^ Risk ^ Consequence ^ Probability **(L/ | + | |
| - | | Floatation/ | + | |
| - | | Sail/Hull design is unacceptable | + | |
| - | | Styrofoam Model does not work | Mistakes in our calculations and design, delay in project. The 1:1 scale Styrofoam model is incompatible due to design and features incorporated | + | |
| - | | Non-functional teamwork | + | |
| - | | Late for Deadlines due to incapability of team mates | Too late hand in deliverables, | + | |
| - | | Miss the Deadline due to technical problems | Too late hand in deliverables or less good grades or delay in total project | **(M/ | + | |
| - | | Materials are not as expected | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Risk: **Buoyancy Problems** | + | |
| - | ^ __Probability=> | + | |
| - | ^ Very Low (0,05) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Low (0,1) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Medium (0,2) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ High (0,5) | | | 0,25| | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Risk: **Sail Problems** | + | |
| - | ^ __Probability=> | + | |
| - | ^ Very Low (0,05) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Low (0,1) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Medium (0,2) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ High (0,5) | | | 0,25| | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Risk: **Foam model does not work** | + | |
| - | ^ __Probability=> | + | |
| - | ^ Very Low (0,05) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Low (0,1) | | | 0,05 | | | + | |
| - | ^ Medium (0,2) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ High (0,5) | | | | | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Risk: **Teamwork Problems** | + | |
| - | ^ __Probability=> | + | |
| - | ^ Very Low (0,05) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Low (0,1) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Medium (0,2) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ High (0,5) | |0,15 | | | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Risk: **Missed Deadlines/ Missing Persons** | + | |
| - | ^ __Probability=> | + | |
| - | ^ Very Low (0,05) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Low (0,1) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Medium (0,2) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ High (0,5) | |0,15 | | | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Risk: **Miss Deadlines/ | + | |
| - | ^ __Probability=> | + | |
| - | ^ Very Low (0,05) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Low (0,1) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Medium (0,2) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ High (0,5) | | 0,15 | | | | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Risk: **Material Problems** | + | |
| - | ^ __Probability=> | + | |
| - | ^ Very Low (0,05) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Low (0,1) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ^ Medium (0,2) | |0,06 | | | | + | |
| - | ^ High (0,5) | | | | | | + | |
| - | ==== 3.8 Procurement ==== | + | |
| - | The development and manufacture of a sailboat includes a vast array of components and materials to which we have the responsibility of sourcing quality suppliers for the design. A quality to cost comparison must be made and a final material or component must be selected that will fit the bill of our project. Due to restrictions we were only allowed to use local Portuguese shops and websites however, our client Eduardo Silva from LSA, has stated international purchases may be acceptable but only after his authorisation. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel59> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Taking these criteria into consideration, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel60> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Once on an international market, the autonomous sailboat can be developed at lower costs due to higher demands thus affordable supplier demands. This will improve revenue in our company by reducing costs over time while growing our quality exponentially. This must all coordinate with the compliance of the product to the customer, for filling all requirements on every product delivered. | + | |
| - | ==== 3.9 Stakeholders management ==== | + | |
| - | Stakeholder management is the process of managing the expectation of anyone that has an interest in a project, will be effected by its deliverables/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabe17> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | ^ Stakeholder | + | |
| - | | Team members | Project Development | Improve our skills, know new cultures having international team mates. | | + | |
| - | | Fernando Ferreira | + | |
| - | | Alberto Pereira | Project Management | Accurate use of the techniques for project management. | | + | |
| - | | Luis Filipe Caeiro Castanheira | Energy and Sustainability | A good know of the sustainability principles involved in the design and in the development of the project. | + | |
| - | | Ana Barata | Communication and Portuguese | Good understanding of basic Portuguese language and how correctly communicate our results to other stakeholders. | | + | |
| - | | Alberto Peixoto Pinto | Team Building | Correct division of the roles inside the team, good understanding of everyone strengths and weakness. | | + | |
| - | | Andreia de Sousa Taveira da Gama | Marketing | Deliver a well rounded knowledge of the market at which we intend to enter and progress into over the coming years. | | + | |
| - | | Francisco Marques Vieira | Ethics & Deontology | Consciousness of the basic principles of ethics & deontology at the bottom of engineering projects. Applying Liability Principles in all aspects of engineering development| | + | |
| - | | Supervisors | Follow and supervise project steps| Respect the deadlines, doing a successful project. | | + | |
| - | | Eduardo Silva | Client | Develop a prototype in respect of some constraints. | | + | |
| - | | ISEP | University | Responsibility as members of the uni and respect the culture at uni | | + | |
| - | | Benedita Malheiro | Chief Supervisor | Good and successful project | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel61> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our four concepts for the stakeholders management are keep satisfied, manage closely, keep informed and monitor. These concepts are influenced by the power and the interest that the stakeholder has in our project. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Keep satisfied**: | + | |
| - | This will consist of the fact that we will try to reach the expectation that the stakeholder has towards us as members of the project-team but also on the project itself. Therefore we need to analyze the stakeholders interest and also review ourselves in our project progress. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Manage closely**: | + | |
| - | The concept of manage closely displays our most important stakeholders. They have a high power in changing our requirements and objectives and also have a high interest in the project success. For these group we will try to keep them weekly and/or monthly updated by meetings, emails and work with them together as we proceed with our tasks. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | **Keep informed**: | + | |
| - | Stakeholders in this segment will be kept updated by email or indirect via managing our homepage. Although they have a high interest, they have a low power which leads to the fact that we should have less commitment to meet with them and spent time in their management. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Monitor**: | + | |
| - | All stakeholders in this segment have to be monitored in respect to their satisfaction. For example any teacher in the subject has to be satisfied with the work done in the chapter of the report and also participation during class but on the other hand the project itself has a low interest for them. This leads to the fact that we will rather monitor that we perform well in their class and provide them with the filtered information needed for their specific part in the project. | + | |
| - | ==== 3.10 Task Management ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel62> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel63> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel64> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel65> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel66> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel67> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel68> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel69> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel70> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel71> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel72> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 3.11 Conclusion ==== | + | |
| - | A projects success is dependant on team organisation and logistics, in order for these to be produced properly positioning must be taken in the team atmosphere ensuring trust and understanding of individuals roles and more importantly each members goals. Balance is key when delegating and deciding tasks we believe we have spread the work evenly among team members, involving everyone with there strengths and even weaknesses to produce a quality product in the desired time frame and budget that we must adhere too. Overall our goal is to deliver a product to the client with minimal risk and with strict rules on procurement while involving all stakeholders in the progression of the project. | + | |
| - | ===== 4. Marketing Plan ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 4.1 Introduction ==== | + | |
| - | Oceans cover 71% of our world surface. For many years the sea was mainly navigated and explored, but nowadays humanity possesses the technology to analyse the sea and find resources for energy and research functions. This new approach of investigating offshore about the sea´s diversity and its unforeseen fortunes is a great opportunity for unmanned sailboats. | + | |
| - | In the process of a continuous development, | + | |
| - | An autonomous sail boat can satisfy the needs of many companies in this way, with several sensors for several needs. | + | |
| - | Our goal of the marketing plan is to find a potential market by analysing competition, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The easy way to display a marketing process is shown in Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel73> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To have a successful marketing process and strategy we will have to understand our product itself. Our boat will fulfill different purposes offshore and will be capable to use a great variety of sensors and cameras. To specify the effectiveness of our segmentation and positioning later on as well as our potential customer analysis, we have to bear in mind all different product dimensions. It is important that the customer recognizes the his personal benefit. "The main target of marketing is that the selling process is redundant. The object is that you understand the customer and their needs in a way that the developed product matches perfectly with these and will sell itself." | + | |
| - | The next figure will display what kind of product dimensions we have to take into consideration while analyzing the customer needs. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel74> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The dimensions of the product that we have to keep in mind for any marketing strategy are containing aspects of the boat that can be offered to any customer apart from just the boat itself. The core product or core customer value we sell is a sailboat that can sail autonomously and stay in a specific region for a defined amount of time. Apart from this we also have to take into consideration to think about the necessity of design aspects which is part of the actual product. It might be important for our customers to have a special kind of design. Mainly because our product will be operating in the name of the business and could cause public interest. Furthermore we will have to ensure a unique and high quality. This is important because our customers will have to rely on the product as it will be not in direct contact with humans. Next we need to manage to build up a certain brand name to attain loyalty and bonding towards our products. As business to business is a hard market with a low number of customers we need to attain good relations. Lastly it is in terms of the augmented dimension it is important to offer a good after sales service. All these aspects are essential for a good marketing campaign. | + | |
| - | ==== 4.2 Market Analysis ==== | + | |
| - | "A market is a virtuell or real place where the offer of a product meet with its demand which concludes in a price." | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 4.2.1 Macro Environment === | + | |
| - | The macro environment is composed by the major external and uncontrollable factors that influence an organization' | + | |
| - | We can study the macro environment of our product with a P.E.S.T analysis, composed by political, economic, social and technologic factors | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel75> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.2.1.1 Economical environment == | + | |
| - | We focus on this chapter on economical background of Europe and Portugal in particular, due to the fact that Portugal is the country in which our brand and company will born. | + | |
| - | The European Crisis was the background of the Great Recession on Portugal, which was a debt crisis during 2010-2014 that led the country led to the county being unable to repay or refinance its government debt without the assistance of third parties. | + | |
| - | We can see in the graph one of the results of crisis, the fall of the gross domestic product. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel76> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Instead of the crisis, Portugal has expanded its research and innovation system over the last decade, increasing its investment in research at a remarkable average annual real growth rate of 7 % between 2000 and 2007. However, R&D intensity in Portugal decreased by an average of 0.16 % from 2008 | + | |
| - | to 2011. [44] | + | |
| - | In the table below we can see Portugal performance in research, innovation and competitiveness. The indicators relate knowledge investment and input to performance or economic output throughout the innovation cycle. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel77> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In addition to this is the Research and Development intensity projection | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel78> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Focusing in the energy production, according to the European Reneawable energy council, the installed capacity in 2009 was approx. 250 MW. This included La Rance in France that has an annual production of 550 GWh. In terms of electricity production generated by the sector, ocean energy estimates the following: 0.62 TWh in 2010, 8.94 TWh in 2020, 150 TWh in 2030, 549 TWh in 2040 and 645 TWh in 2050. Focusing on Portugal in October 2011 Principle Power deployed a full-scale prototype WindFloat 5km off the coast of Aguçadoura. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.2.1.2 Technologic Environment == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Two factors are included in the technologic environment of an autonomous sailboat. The marine technology background, and the improving robotic background . As seen above the first is expanding thanks to human needs to find resource. For the second, according to the internation federation of robotic, In 2013, robot sales increased by 12% to 178,132 units, by far the highest level ever recorded for one year. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.2.1.3 Political environment == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Political backgrounds influence organizations in many ways and are able to create strengths and opportunities for organizations. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | EU provide an integrated maritim policy to provide a more coherent approach to maritime issues, with increased coordination between different policy areas. The Blue growth is the long term strategy to support sustainable growth in the marine and maritime sectors as a whole. Seas and oceans are drivers for the European economy and have great potential for innovation and growth. It is the maritime contribution to achieving the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. The strategy consists on three components: | + | |
| - | * Develop | + | |
| - | * Essential components to provide knowledge, legal certainty and security in the blue economy. | + | |
| - | * Sea basin strategies to ensure tailor-made measures and to foster cooperation between countries. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In June 2014, The European Council adopted a Maritime Security Strategy for the global maritime domain. The objective of this strategy is to provide a common framework for relevant authorities at national and European levels to ensure coherent development of their specific policies and a European response to maritime threats and risks. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The economical/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==4.2.1.4 Social Background== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In 21st century the interest for green energy, for food and climate change have become a part of the general public, society at large, not only for big companies. For this reason our product could be useful to take oceans data for methereologists, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===4.2.2 MicroAnalyisis=== | + | |
| - | The Micro analyisis, is the analyisis of the immediate environment that impacts a business. the micro environment includes considerations related to competitors, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.2.2.1 Competitors == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In formulating business strategy, we must consider the carachteristics and strategies of the company' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We can segment our competitors in two groups: | + | |
| - | * Similar products, but not already in the market. | + | |
| - | * Different products, already in the market with similar functions. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == Autonomous Sailboats == | + | |
| - | As Seen in the previous section Related Work, several products similar to our already exist. They are not already on the market, but is probable that if the market will revealed high profit margins, most of the companies with mature technology will try to enter. For example FASt was designed for race, but can be modified for market reasons. The entry of new competitors is likely in this case because there are no major barriers to entry, there is future growth potential and the competitive rivalry is no so intense | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == Data Buoys == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In the market are present a big variety of data buoys with different sensors for different uses. | + | |
| - | * Satlantic’s LOBO (Land/Ocean Biogeochemical Observatory) is a complete turnkey data buoy monitoring system in sensitive and diverse ecological areas such as estuaries and inland waters. | + | |
| - | * TRYAXIS is a data buoy that can measure waves and currents | + | |
| - | * MetBuoy can monitor, record and display wind speed & direction togehter with meteorological data. | + | |
| - | * Turbibuoy | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We can individuate in a table strenghts and weakness of these competitors beetween our product. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabe18> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | ^ Name ^ Strenghts ^ Weakness ^ | + | |
| - | |Data buoys |Mature technology and market. Lower price. Easy to use. Lower risk |Buoys are motionless. Smaller markets area| | + | |
| - | |FASt| Appropriate Engineering background. More experience | Design focused on race and velocity instead of stability | + | |
| - | |Saildrone, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.2.2.2 Potential Customers == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We see our main potential customers in a " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <figure flabel79> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Despite the preexisting autonomous boat market, our purpose in this section is to identify potential costumers in different sectors of the market. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Oil rigs and Oil companies. There' | + | |
| - | Our boat could be improved with several of this features to help finding oil. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel80> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Today there are around 900 offshore oil rigs in Europe, most of these in the North Sea owned by Great Britain companies, and in Italy.[(Greenreport)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | * Off-shore wind farms. Here a list of the biggest 5 European offshore wind farms and the Portuguese Wind Float | + | |
| - | <table tlabe18> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | ^ Name ^ Position ^ Total Power (MW) ^ | + | |
| - | |Blekinge Offshore |Sweden|2500| | + | |
| - | |Moray Firth|United Kingdom| 1300 | | + | |
| - | |Creyke Beck A |United Kingdom|1200| | + | |
| - | |Creyke Beck B |United Kingdom | + | |
| - | |East Anglia (formerly Norfolk Bank)|United Kingdom|1200| | + | |
| - | |Wind Float | Povòa de Varzim, | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Metereologic and oceonography industry. For example The National Oceanography Centre (NOC) undertakes integrated ocean research and technology development from the coast to the deep ocean. It provides long-term marine science capability including: major facilities; sustained ocean observing, mapping and survey; data management, and scientific advice. Marine science national capability is provided to the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC).[17] | + | |
| - | * Nation governments. | + | |
| - | * Port surveilance. Port areas as well as ships docked in ports are vulnerable to numerous hazardous scenarios and are targets for theft and terrorist attacks. Given the vast size of the perimeters of most port areas, manual inspection of all potential points of entry is infeasible. Currently, a number of port facilities are equipped with video surveillance systems. Our boat could improve a surveillance system giving a continous monitoring of a selected area. | + | |
| - | * Fish Farms. In Europe, aquaculture accounts for about 20% of fish production [European commission]. Lot of Fish Farms use chemical as hygiene products | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel81> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 4.3 SWOT Analysis ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | S.W.O.T. is an acronym that stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, | + | |
| - | Strengths and weaknesses are internal to our team, | + | |
| - | New businesses should use a SWOT analysis as a part of their planning process. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel82> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 4.4 Strategic Objectives ==== | + | |
| - | To reach a good position on the market, every start-up business has to define strategic objectives in a limitated duration. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Market objectives for the first 5 years: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Gain experience on the first year. | + | |
| - | * Establish company, policy, logo and name | + | |
| - | * Partecipate to MicroTransat challenge to test and advertise our product. | + | |
| - | * Sell the first prototype to a company. | + | |
| - | * Build other 5 products. | + | |
| - | * Sell 5 products to different companies. | + | |
| - | * Reach the break-even-point and a little profit to continue to produce. | + | |
| - | * Enter on the international market thanks to the costumer confidence and advertise. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 4.5 Segmentation ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Due to the fact that our product is mainly operating as a data collector and will stay for a long term mission in certain water areas, we are opting on a Business to Business (B2B) market or the possibility of a tackling two markets , Business to Government (B2G). | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The segmentation is one of the essential marketing processes. It is the basis to decide upon what kind of market segment we want to focus our campaign on and try the position ourselves along the competition. | + | |
| - | One approach to explain what segmentation and its ongoing steps are is the following: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel83> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | If you want to start off with your segmentation you firstly have to think about how you want to approach your customers at the end. There are different ways to do so. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Firstly there is mass marketing. This means you do not differentiate for specific segments in your marketing campaign. Your marketing will be focus on the slogan "one size fits all" | + | |
| - | * Next you can do a niche marketing which is a specific definition of you product and marketing mix for small sub segments. | + | |
| - | * Micro marketing in a " | + | |
| - | * Lastly there is the target marketing which will be our approach. This means that we will adapt our marketing mix and product to a wider defined segmentation.[(GrundlagendesMarketing)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | After understanding these basics we can continue with our segmentation of the market wich can be done by various aspects. We firstly want to break it down into the these four criteria: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel84> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.5.1 Characteristics of the companies == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To start off we want to give a basic overview of the global ocean market and its various industries. From the table you can see the biggest market segments in terms of overall worthiness in a year. It includes investments and returns depending on the segment. Furthermore we added a table to demonstrate where this global ocean market takes place in the world. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel85> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel86> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | From this Figures we can extract some important information. The total market for ocean related businesses was in 2000 747 Billion US Dollars . This means that there is a huge monetary potential in the market. The biggest sector is the oil and gas production but also interesting for us is the amount spent on R&D (19Billion US Dollar). Additionally we can extract that ocean survey expenditure is with one billion US Dollars also really high and underlines our approach for implementing a research and monitoring sailboat. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.5.2 Geographic Segmentation == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Geographic segmentation is a criteria we chose because we want to know the physical location of the potential and actual customers. We would like to get information about where our products is being sold or can be possible to get sold in order to increase our advertisement and sales in these regions. | + | |
| - | Our criteria for this segmentations are: investments on research, quantity of potential costumers and employees with naval education background, location of the city/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel87> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel88> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | From this data we can extract that Europe and Asia are the biggest markets in terms of the worthiness of marine businesses and the highest financial forces are in the segments related to offshore and gas production but also interesting for us is the Research and Development (R&D) segment with 19 Billion US Dollar. On basis of this knowledge about the market we want to concentrate on Europe as the members of our team come from Europe as well and have a profound knowledge about cultural and language aspects. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Continuing with the geographical segmentation we focused on the fact that we build a sailboat and we have some regional limitation. As a matter of fact it is more likely that our potential customers are located close to the sea, a lake or a river. By investigating on this we focused on seas or big lakes as the need for research boats will be rather interesting for bigger areas that can't be easily monitored. On basis of the location limitation next to the see and the size of the city we searched for the biggest cities in Europe fulfilling these criteria. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe19> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 500px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Number ^ City ^ Size ^ Investment ^ | + | |
| - | | 1 | Iceland/ | + | |
| - | | 2 |Ireland|1, | + | |
| - | | 3 |London|8, | + | |
| - | | 4 |Oslo|925, | + | |
| - | | 5 |Stockholm|1, | + | |
| - | | 6 |Helsinki| 1,159,211 | 19 | | + | |
| - | | 7 |Kopenhagen| 1,181,239 | 30 | | + | |
| - | | 8 |Hamburg| 1,800,000 | 300 | | + | |
| - | | 9 |Amsterdam| 821,702 | 125 | | + | |
| - | | 10 |Antwerpen| 510,610 | 52 | | + | |
| - | | 11 |Genoa| 586,180 | 100 | | + | |
| - | | 12 |Marseille| 850,726 | 306 | | + | |
| - | | 13 |Barcelona| 1,620,943 | 121 | | + | |
| - | | 14 |Lisbon| 545,245 | 7 | | + | |
| - | | 15 |Istanbul| 9,000,000 | 37 | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP controlling> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel89> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Taking in these into consideration, | + | |
| - | <table tlabe20> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | ^ Rank ^ Country ^ Expenditures on R&D (US billion dollars) ^ Expenditures on R&D Per-capita (US dollars) ^ | + | |
| - | |1|United States|405.3| 1275.64 | | + | |
| - | |7|United Kingdom|38.4| 602.78 | | + | |
| - | |4|Germany| 69.5 | 861.04 | | + | |
| - | |39|Hungary| 1.7 | 171.61 | | + | |
| - | |12|Italy| 19 | 316.70 | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | As we can extract from the ongoing tables and figures, our target market will be considerably in european countries. Possible cities are Hamburg, London or other cities/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Conclusion of geographic segmentation: | + | |
| - | * Target markets geographically after Portugal will be Europe. | + | |
| - | * We are European, and we know languages and cultures of costumers. | + | |
| - | * Research and development funds are high in European countries, second in respective to the US. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | We can also say that the interest of the exploitation for example of offshore wind plants is growing in Europe. Due to the fact that the amount of land used is very high the result are strong limitations for the installation of onshore wind farms. Today the offshore operating wind power is 12 MW, with two wind farms in Denmark and one in Netherlands; | + | |
| - | In the world the onshore installed wind power is already exceeding the 4000 Mega Watt (MW). However, there has not been done much so far in terms of the offshore area outside Europe. | + | |
| - | The European four year forecast on the prototypical offshore wind farms looks significantly promising and suggests to promote a similar approach in many densely populated coastal countries in the world with high electricity demand.[(Gaudiosi1996899)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.5.3 Way of procurement == | + | |
| - | In terms of the way of procurement we mean that we want to analyze how our potential customers in the target market segments are processing their buyings, what is there interest in buying, what causes their intention to buy? | + | |
| - | As a matter of fact Business to Business is mainly done by procurement teams, in our case we focus on decentralized procurement. These teams have certain exceptions on a product and evaluate the product in the buying process upon defined criteria. This means that we will have to convince our customers by quality and functionalities of the product and the process of buying will be larger than normally with private customers. To picture this process we have in the following a typical process of buying a higher monetary product. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel90> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | As we can see, the way of procurement is highly objective and at the stage of receipt offers we will compete with other products who serve the same need. That means that our product dimensions or their purchasing criteria will have to focus on objectively quantifiable and functional dimensions rather than on packaging design for example. Furthermore after sales services are important in this terms because other companies will expect from us to deliver good quality and to held us responsible when problems occur. The amount of order will be more likely to be small. There is not a high chance of selling big bundles of sailboats to one customer at the same time. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Next we need to analyze the interest they have to buy our product and how they approach us or we get need to approach them. The main interest of the potential customer in the segment of R&D and maritime monitoring (for example oil platforms, wind farms etc) will be the functionality of our product. For this we need to approach them by demonstrating the qualities of the boat and convince them about the necessity of it. For example the Research and Development market segment for maritime products has a total investment volume of 19 Billion US Dollars, as already mentioned. This is divided into the following percentages: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel91> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | Although the defense part of the investments is the biggest component, we can underline the interest of our company in approaching the markets of marine science and oil& | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.5.4 Criteria of usage == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | For the criteria of usage we have to focus on the technologies that the potential customers may focus on and that we need to address our strategy to. Another aspect is the question if the buyer is the actual user or not and what kind of qualifications our users have. This means that we might have to explain our product and functioning in detail or not. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To begin with, we already mentioned that the main focus of purchase will be in the functionality of the product. It has to have a high value for the customer rather than a solution that we sell. Our customers are basically also the users which means that we will have a direct contact to them. The next open question is if we should address our product to customers that need a lot or less supportive services. As the following figure will display, we will focus on value buyers. That means that the main interest of the buyer will be the added value for him. We expect that these costumers do not need to get an intensive support service from us. However, to maintain good customer relationships and as defined a high " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel92> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | == 4.5.5 Conclusion == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Summing up our analysis, we come to the conclusion that our target market segments will be in the Research & Development sector which can be institutions investigating on maritime organisms or structures as well as searching for new soil resources. Furthermore potential customers are in the segment for monitoring offshore installations such as wind parks and/or oil platforms etc. For the possible missions that we think our boat can fulfill please check the storyboard. As we mentioned there are high potentials in these segments and we are keen in exploiting these. For doing this the best way, we will analyze in the following chapter the best positioning strategy. | + | |
| - | ==== 4.6 Strategy/ | + | |
| - | The target of a good positioning strategy is to adjust the strengths and the requirements and opportunities of the market or its segments with each other. Therefore you follow certain defined steps. Firstly you identify the customer groups towards which you have a unique and special advantage in comparison to your competition. After this you will positioning your product in the market and the perception of the customer. At the end of the process of positioning and differentiation the customer has to know why he should buy our product. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To explain what positioning is, we could say that we will try to pursue a clearly defined, unique and desirable position in our target market in comparison to our competition. The strategic options for positioning ourselves are to strengthen our current position, find a unfilled position or repositioning. In these terms and as we are a new company in the market we will need to find a new position in the market and differentiate us from the competition. The steps to follow the positioning on will be: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Identification of possible competitive advantages | + | |
| - | * Choose the right competitive advantages | + | |
| - | * Develop a positioning strategy | + | |
| - | * Communicate our strategy on the market | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To start with to find our possible competitive advantages we can analyze the product itself or our services offered to the customer. Our product with its function is not available in the market. Although there are already autonomous sailboats, they mainly focus on the participation in tournaments. Most of them are made to be fast and sail from a defined start to a finish point. | + | |
| - | Although there are many prototypes of autonomous sailboats in the market we can still call our product innovative in terms of its functioning. These two aspect are the biggest competitive advantages we see for us and we need to concentrate on this in our positioning. | + | |
| - | Additional to the product differentiation we see a huge chance to take benefits for additional customer services. As the existing autonomous sailboats are mainly concept boats from institutions or universities we can exploit the chance in offering services for our business customers when selling. For innovative and technical products there is most of the time the need of explanation. Therefore we want to offer trainings for users and also to build a long term bounding to our customers in offering services and maintenance, | + | |
| - | More differentiation aspects can be made by our employees which we refer to our chapter of social sustainability with our approaches to enhance the commitment and satisfaction of them. Our benefit will be a better public relation and reputation in the society.[(GrundlagendesMarketing)] | + | |
| - | At the end of this so called benefit segmentation we can sum up that: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabel1> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | ^ Benefit criteria ^ Description ^ | + | |
| - | | 1) Modular design | Easily adjustable for different purposes. Cameras or sensors | | + | |
| - | | 2) Flexibility |Navigable to stay in a certain defined region| | + | |
| - | | 3) Environmental aspect | No use of fuel, recycling by our company | | + | |
| - | | 4) Customer service | Maintenance of the boat, trainings and service hotlines | + | |
| - | | 5) Labor costs | No humans needed on the boat | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Our approach to get a by the customer recognized unique position is to be quite different from other businesses. By enhancing the mentioned benefit criteria it is possible for us to present a product that does not exist this way in the market. Our purpose is to reach the costumer bonding by their understanding of needs and being flexibles to react on changes of their needs. | + | |
| - | There are fondamentally three approaches to achieve a good business and a good relationship with costumers that could be summarizes in a triangle: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel93> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | The " | + | |
| - | We can better achieve our goal with the anthitesis of the "Best Product" | + | |
| - | ==== 4.7 Adapted Marketing-Mix ==== | + | |
| - | In this sub-chapter we are going to define how we are going to approach our target market and attract the customer for our product. The previous stages that we described are for this decisions upon the marketing mix essential in order to invest your time and money in the most profitable way and ensure efficiency. What we did so far is displayed in the following figure. It mainly pictures the process we did so far in order to find out about the target market. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel94> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | After analyzing the market environment we focused on the potential customers and competitor in the market. Then we proceeded with our swot analysis and did the segmentation and positioning in the market. | + | |
| - | To understand now what the target of the marketing mix is we can state that we need to understand the consumer behavior and trigger his desire to buy our product. Doing so we define our product and services with the concept of the „4P´s“ which are: product, place, price and promotion. These criteria are meant to create a relation between our company and the customer. It is a stimuli that will result in a response by the customer. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel95> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This concept is often used to explain the process of our action and the reaction of the customer. Apart from the stimuli of the „4P´s“ we also have situational factors like demographics, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Now we want to define what the meaning of each element of the „4P´s“ is and how we want to strategically use these aspect to attract potential buyers. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel96> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 4.7.1 Product === | + | |
| - | To start off we already mentioned in terms of the product its various dimensions which are the core product, the extended product and augmented product. This is essential to fully understand the functioning of this criteria of marketing mix. As a definition „a product is a bundle of features, that targets the creation of customer value.“ [(Marketingmanagement)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To create this overall product value we can systemize the lifecycle stage of the product in order to decide on the policy we apply to. There are the possibilities of innovation management, the management of products that already exist in the market and the management of brand names. | + | |
| - | As our product does not exist like this in the market and will implement customer perception of novelty, we will focus our product strategy on innovation management and brand management. This includes gathering ideas, defining the concept, evaluating the concept and finally launching the market. | + | |
| - | The process of the innovation management starts with the firm establishment of your innovation. We did this in our chapter of state of the art, where we investigated on the functioning of the boat and also the technology we will apply. Ongoing we defined and selected the best concept for our boat with its design, measurement and engineering blueprint. Lastly the ultimate process stage will be the market implementation. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our product strategy will be to offer high quality that we want to outline in our promotion and a extensive customer service that ensures a close and longterm relation with them. The product will have a long expected life time and throughout this we need to keep the customer linked to us in order to not only attain income by selling our product but also to offer maintenance services. Additionally there will be a warranty given on all components for their proper functioning. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel97> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The main dimension when thinking of this brand management, that we answered is: | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel98> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our slogan will be: Autonomous Sailing, Always one step ahead! | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 4.7.2 Price === | + | |
| - | Now we want to describe the marketing mix in terms of the pricing of the product. The price of the product has some characteristics that are very important to mention. First character of the price is, that it can be change very fast. Contrary it is hard to return to former price levels in the same speed. One of the reasons is the high influence of the price towards the impression of the customer. Furthermore any change in the price can have a fast effect on sales and on the market situation. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Taking this into consideration, | + | |
| - | Next the price also depends on the marketing objectives that we set before entering the market. Due to a low competition and our offer of a new innovative product which has to manifest the quality we promised, our objective will be the product quality leadership. Higher prices have to cover the costs of our qualified employees and the costs for R&D. Nevertheless the still ongoing crisis in Europe and especially in Portugal are effecting our price concept as well. Although the outbreak of the financial crisis is already a couple of years ago, we are still facing the consequences which are inherent for our price level. This might enable us to offer financing possibilities to our potential customers in order to skip the high purchase costs and split them over the years of usage. Besides this will enhance the bonding towards our company as well. | + | |
| - | To find the best price and still cover costs we will undertake a cost based analysis before entering the market. This will ensure that we can exactly define the overall production costs and then add a profit margin that is on the one hand acceptable for the customer and on the other hand will ensure a constant business growth. The overall strategy will be a so called " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe18> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 500px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Component | + | |
| - | | Sail | 150€ | | + | |
| - | | Sensors & Camera| Dependent on customer | | + | |
| - | | Hull | 150€ | | + | |
| - | | Keel | 95€ | | + | |
| - | | Rudder | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 4.7.3 Promotion === | + | |
| - | The next part of the marketing mix is the promotion strategy. Basically the promotion is about transferring a statement towards the customer to create a certain knowledge, expectancy and desire to buy our product. The most common methodology to define this process is „AIDA“. This approach is about four main steps: **A**ttention, | + | |
| - | The **A**ttention part of the promotion channel used should implement an awareness of the product in the potential customers mind. The customer has to know that this product exists. Next **I**nterest means that our promotion is provoking a certain emotion and persuading the audience of the need to purchase that specific product. After this the **D**esire part tries to implement a desire to possess the product and finally takes **A**ction to buy it. Additionally to this we can state that in the modern marketing theory we see a growing impact of the fact of satisfaction. Marketing theory nowadays is also focusing on long term relationships and customer life time value which are the basis for sustainable business success. | + | |
| - | To enhance this, there are different ways for marketing communication explained in Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel99> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | As our product is innovative, has a certain complexity and needs to be sold B2B, we will focus on a direct contact towards our customers. For us it will be important to design our way of advertising informative and comparative. As our product is not a totally new technology, we will try to convince our potential customers to compare current products that might serve the same function with our product. A good example could be a data buoy which is only a stationary data collector. A good tool that we will use in terms of public relations will be a website that we design to inform potential customers about the product/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Although personal selling is one of the most expensive ways for promotion, we will use this as a core approach to reach for customer interest. On the one hand we want to participate on different events like shows and expositions. This will help to be able to catch the customers interest by showing videos, demonstrations or convince them face to face. Although there might be the risk that not everyone on this expositions will be interested in this but this also highly depends on the topic of the expositions. There is also the possibility for the direct contact to use specialized leaflets like the one we already designed to send it to potential customers. It is possible to individualize these to give the impression of being something special for our company. Additionally we can send qualified and trained sellers to the companies as well. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We also want to use print media, which has the big advantages of the exact timing and you can do it in a short period of time. Although you might have the problem of a high percentage of dispersion you actually need to get a first idea of the product in the market. You could place advertisements in journals for robotics, engineering or researches like „Geo Magazine“ where you have at least a reader that is interested in technologies. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe19> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 500px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Medium | + | |
| - | | TV | High availability, | + | |
| - | | Print media| Exact timing, short term predictability| High divergence loss, unspecific in terms of target group | | + | |
| - | | Radio | Possible to regional segmentation, | + | |
| - | | Outdoor Advertisement | + | |
| - | | Internet/ | + | |
| - | | Direct Marketing | + | |
| - | | Sponsoring | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 4.7.4 Place === | + | |
| - | Lastly we come to the place in the methodology of the „4P´s“. First there are three central decisions to do respective the market orientated activities. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel100> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The design of the distribution refers to our sales organization and also to the ways of distribution we choose. | + | |
| - | There are basically two approaches, the direct and the indirect distribution. Indirect refers to the situation that a external distribution partner is in charge for a big acquisition function in the process. The following table is pointing out the pros and cons for these approaches: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe19> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 500px center> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ^ Distribution Channel | + | |
| - | | Direct | + | |
| - | | Indirect| Mass distribution is possible, costs for distribution shifts to intermediary, | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | For the sales department we want use direct distribution and install a key account manager who will be responsible for maintaining a close contact with our customers and ensure a high level of satisfaction with our product and services. Furthermore we will offer trainings to ensure that our sales employees are well prepared to convince potential customers about our product. For us it is more useful to have a low amount of highly qualified employees than a high amount of employees without the right skills to persuade customers. Personal selling demands a high level of qualification to understand how to approach customers and how to guide them on the right way to finally purchase. Also they have to understand the product which is more complex than others. | + | |
| - | In terms of the different distribution channels we choose to do indirect distribution through external delivery services. The main considerations that we took into account are to think about efficiency and effectiveness. Due to the fact that our company will be small and has a low limited budget we can not afford to have an own delivery service and also we do not have any experiences. By negotiating a contract with an external delivery service, which can be DHL, Hermes, UPS etc., we can first ensure high level of know how to handle the boat and also we will have a guarantee for safe delivery. The big disadvantage is that we will rely on the high standard of service by the external but to minimize this we can compare them and define common goals. Nevertheless we will have a direct contact to the customer. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Through the channel direct distribution we will also use fairs or directly contact our potential customers. Although this is an expensive way we will be able to build up an intensive relation with them and also adjust the functionality of the boat for each customer individually. The direct contact can be done by sales professionals at the customers ground or telephone, sending flyer and information material. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Additionally we have the design of our sales processes which includes the logistics. Our business will not have an extra storage for finished goods as we will engineer to order. This will decrease our costs. Furthermore we will offer the possibility to transport our product via container vessels internationally. For this we will design a transport box to ensure safety and a fully functioning product. Another possibility is to use trucks from our external delivery service. For this our transport box will be also very handy.Here is a list of possible transport modes and there pros and cons. [(GrundlagendesMarketing)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel101> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Lastly summing up the chapter of marketing mix, we want to point out once again our goal to remain a close contact towards our customers in all stages of the sales process and the increase recognition of the customer lifetime value. In the relation to the marketing mix it refers to the Customer Relationship Management which is described in the following Figure. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel102> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 4.8 Budget ==== | + | |
| - | The purpose of this section is to quantify and choose how to spent an initial budget of 5000 Euro for the first year. | + | |
| - | At the moment we are not going to have any cost for employers and staff. | + | |
| - | The most important aim in the first year is to advertise and make known the product, for this reason lot of money will be spent in travels, to take our product in any of most important naval and robotic Fairs. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel103> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | This is a list of Fairs in which we want to partecipate. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <table tlabel0> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 400px> | + | |
| - | ^ Name ^ Topic ^ Location ^ Period ^ | + | |
| - | |SMM | Leading international maritime trade fair |Hamburg|September 2016| | + | |
| - | |Salone Nautico | Companies of the maritime segment show their new innovations |Genova| October 2015 | | + | |
| - | |Hannover Messe| The worldwide most important industrial fair, expositors show their new inventions and trends | + | |
| - | |Autonomous Unmanned Systems & Robotics Expo | Exhibition of manufacturers, | + | |
| - | |International Port Security| New innovations for port security | London | June 2015 | | + | |
| - | |AUVSI’s Unmanned Systems| Largest global community of commercial and defense leaders in intelligent robotics, drones and unmanned systems | New Orleans USA | May 2016 | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 4.9 Strategy Control ==== | + | |
| - | The strategy control is a tool for us to make sure that we are on the previously defined track and still attaining our marketing goals. To ensure this we will monitor, compare and correct our work performance. We need to ensure that our activities are done in a way to enhance the accomplishment of our organizational or marketing goals. As we set our objectives and analyzed our market opportunities we have to monitor our achievement. Doing so we need to get data from our performance which can be customer feedback or quantifiable data like our return on investment, liquidity development or market share. All of these data has to be collected regularly and analyzed by our employees. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel104> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | To measure our performance there are different possibilities. First there is the personal observation. This has the advantages that you get firsthand knowledge and also the information retained is not filtered. On the other hand it is very time consuming and may be more costly than other possibilities. Next there is the statistical report. This is an easy way to visualize you performance and also effective in showing the relationships involved. Oral reports are one of the fastest ways to get information and also allow verbal and nonverbal feedback. We want to use this as we are going to ask our customers if the product matches their expectations and if they are satisfied with our customer service. Lastly there is the possibility of written reports. This will enable us to store and retrieve the knowledge gathered. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our whole process of control in respect to our managerial decisions will look like the following: | + | |
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel105> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This principe of measuring our marketing efficiency will be a process that can be also applicable for other areas such as our financial area, human resources and production area to monitor our productivity and efficiency. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To support this process we will implement a management information system (MIS) which will provide our management with needed information on a regular basis. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 4.10 Conclusion ==== | + | |
| - | Summing up the previous chapter, we can state that our innovative product will attain a unique selling position. We do not have direct competitors that offer similar range of functioning. To attain a high level of customer satisfaction we want to sell highest quality and retain a close relation towards them. For a long term profitability we want to offer a broad range of customer service and implement the feeling of uniqueness for each customer. We will focus on the B2B market by mainly approaching them in direct contact. Although personal selling is one of the most expensive and timely option, we consider it as the most efficient for our innovative product. For our first step in the market we will use leaflets and articles as promotion and also focus on fairs to get a wide basis of potential customers to know about our product. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | By end 2016 we want to explore the european market and increase our profitability by improving our production processes and marketing strategy. This will be done by our extended level of experience from our primary market Portugal. Our core standards of our company will be high quality, fair customer and employee treatment and offering best service at the market. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel106> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel107> | + | |
| - | {{: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ===== 5 Eco-eficiency Measures for Sustainability ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 5.1 Introduction ==== | + | |
| - | Sustainability is currently playing a major role in all our lives and the issue is causing much debate over the planet to save our civilization and environment. It has been on the forefront of the international agenda for more than a quarter of a century, yet we continue as a species to build economies at considerable costs to the environment. It is evident that social and economic sustainability are only solution although to do so we must have a healthy plan. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | “These are the living forms that constitute the fabric of the ecosystems which sustain | + | |
| - | life on Earth – and the barometer of what we are doing to our own planet, our only home. We ignore their decline at our peril.” | + | |
| - | Marco Lambertini | + | |
| - | Director General | + | |
| - | WWF International[(WWF)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The world ecosystem is being undermined by the human race, as we have become the dominant force that shapes these systems for our own gain. It appears that the solution is a healthier balance to preserve our plant, from supporting the quality of life for animals and humans of communities around the globe. The diagram below illustrates the three most in important domains that affect our way of living. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel108> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | - Environmental | + | |
| - | - Social | + | |
| - | - Economic | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | These interconnected variables are linked indefinitely to achieve eco-efficiency, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our company, “Horizon Sails” thrives to become sustainable by seizing all opportunities to do so at minimal risk to the business, people and the planet. The environmentally friendly approach to material selection and sourcing combined with our aware manufacturing process and efficient distribution is a priority. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | As an accomplished manufacturer and distributor of autonomous sail boats for a variety of environmental aids (sea exploration data etc.) based in Porto, Portugal. The focus to target Europe and Asia was made because of there green policy advancements in recent years has shown a large gap in the market for data collectors at sea. In 2015 we opened our first manufacturing site and distribution warehouse. Our products are custom made for the clients and from an array of easily resourced materials that are supplied from companies in Portugal. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe15> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 500px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Connection | + | |
| - | | Customers | + | |
| - | | Suppliers | + | |
| - | | Stakeholders | + | |
| - | | Employees | + | |
| - | | Communities | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 5.2 Environmental | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We follow Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing. Our key to the solution of environmental problems lies in our policy of adopting environmentally friendly products and production operations – the concept of a eco-factory. We adopt the following guidelines for environmentally conscious product design towards design for environment so as to make the daily operations of a treatment plant environmentally friendly: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.2.1 Process === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(1)** Save energy and the use of renewable energy - Using Energy Star approved equipment is a great way to reduce your total power consumption. The Energy Star sticker are present on energy-efficient office equipment and home appliances. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(2)** Minimising the number of components and ensuring minimal handling of components by Design for Assembly (DFA). DFA is a process by which products are designed with ease of assembly in mind. If a product contains fewer parts it will take less time to assemble, thereby reducing assembly costs. Design for Disassembly (DFD) methodology must be implemented to speed the disposal process. Deciding this method of disassembly during the early design phase and promoting it will allow for parts to be recycled easier at the end of the products life. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(3)** Become a paperless business - Memos, manuals, and other documents don’t need to be printed out. By taking your workplace communications to the email inbox, you can reduce your environmental impact while simultaneously saving electricity. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(4)** Embrace natural lighting - Artificial light is expensive, unhealthy, and environmentally unfriendly. Installing a day lighting system in your building doesn’t need to be expensive – in fact, when you look at the long-term savings, it’s actually a very cost-effective choice. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.2.2 Pollution Control === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 5.2.2.1 Plant Emission | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(1)** Following environmentally conscious manufacturing by adopting environmentally responsible activities like “Zero Avoidable Pollution” and “Green Manufacturing”. Viewing and analyze waste, to transform it from an unavoidable result of our processes, in a measure of our efficiency. The more waste a process generates, the less efficient it is. | + | |
| - | **(2)** Selecting materials for product design for recycling. Our idea is to select those materials that have the right properties for our design and also that can be reused and recycled with the lowest costs. Efficiency rise in energy uses and reduce the proportion of VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds) emission. Our purpose is to reach the Gold standard. | + | |
| - | * The Gold Standard, supported by WWF, is the most rigorous certification standard globally for carbon offset projects. It ensures that energy efficiency and renewable energy projects actually reduce carbon dioxide emissions, and provide benefits to the local population. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(3)** Our plant can use a cogeneration system to heat and power the factory. The heat can be used to raise steam for industrial processes or hot water for local heating, depending on the temperature. This simultaneous production of heat and power is known as " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(4)** Reducing use of water. We want to use tools developed by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Resources Institute to identify levels of water stress at each of our manufacturing sites. We want to use cooling towers with an efficient closed regeneration loop. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(5)** Carbon Capture and Storage. One of our first aim is reducing emissions of (CO< | + | |
| - | Post-process capture. (CO< | + | |
| - | Transport of (CO< | + | |
| - | Geological storage of (CO< | + | |
| - | By now there are risks related to the possibility offered by the technology of (CO< | + | |
| - | the unexpected release of massive amounts of (CO< | + | |
| - | By now only five companies use CCS all around the world, because we are now in a development phase. If this phase will success, probably CCS will be very common in the next 20 years. In this case we will use it if our production will be big enough to produce a consistent quantity of (CO< | + | |
| - | [(CarbonCapturing)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 5.2.2.2 Sea Emissions == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In this section we want to consider and explain some of the most relevant problems related to oceans and seas environment and their causes. For our product we have to take in considerations these problems and understand how our product could be ocean-friendly with some considerations and raccomendations. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == Sea Surface Temperature == | + | |
| - | Ocean surface temperatures increased over the 20th century. Even with some year-to-year change, the overall increase is evident, and sea surface temperatures have been higher during the last thirty years than at any other time since faithful observations began in the late 1800s. Global warming caused by emissions of heat-trapping carbon dioxide has increased the average ocean global temperature by about 0.18°F (0.1°C). This warming has occurred from the surface to a depth of about 2,300 feet (700 meters), where most marine life thrives. [(SeaTemperatureRise)] | + | |
| - | The only way to reduce ocean temperatures is to dramatically reduce emissions of carbon dioxide. However, even if we immediately dropped carbon dioxide emissions to zero, the gases we've already released would take decades or longer to dissipate. | + | |
| - | == Sea Level == | + | |
| - | Sea level has increased at a rate of roughly six-tenths of an inch per decade since 1880. The rate of increase has accelerated in recent years to more than an inch per decade. Changes in sea level is relative and vary by region. Along the U.S. coastline, sea level has raised the most along the Mid-Atlantic coast and parts of the Gulf coast, where some stations registered increases of more than 8 inches between 1960 and 2013. Sea level has decreased relative to the land in parts of Alaska and the Northwest. Our boat can help to control these increase in the sea level. | + | |
| - | == Ocean Acidity == | + | |
| - | The ocean has become more acidic over the past few centuries because of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, which dissolves in the water. Higher acidity affects the balance of minerals in the water, which can make it more difficult for certain marine animals to build their skeletons and shells. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == Over Fishing == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The practice of commercial and non-commercial fishing which consumes fisheries by catching so many adult fish that not enough survive to replenish the population is abounding all around the world. Overfishing exceeds the carrying capacity of a fishery. On a global scale we have enough fishing capacity to cover at least four earth like planets. [(Overfishing)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | In relation to our product we will reduce our own carbon dioxide emission when producing the boat and also by the boat operating without relying on fuel. Another aspect is that our boat will be useful to monitor these environmental developments of the sea to get a better understanding and improve our precautions. | + | |
| - | The environmental impact of our product is really different from motorboats and reconnaissance drones that could be used for similar purpose. Using just renewable energy our boat doesn' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | __These are some reccomendations for our boat end consumers: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * WAX Boat - A good coat of wax on a fiberglass hull prevents surface dirt from becoming engrained. This will reduce the need for detergents when you wash your boat. Pollen, dust, spores, or salt occur naturally and will do no harm when they are washed into the water. wash topsides only- Limit dock side hull cleaning to the above water surface area only -- from the boot stripe up. Use a sponge to effectively remove light growth without creating the clouds of heavy metals usually caused by scrubbing. Rinse your boat with fresh water. use non-toxic cleaners- many cleaning products contain phosphates and other chemicals that are toxic to aquatic ecosystems. Before using products with hazardous warning labels, such as skull and crossbones, try a natural cleaner like vinegar. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Don't use toxic Antifouling paint : Most antifouling bottom paints are destructive to marine life. The newest coatings are formulated to have a less toxic and less long-lasting effect. Silicon, teflon, and other " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Dispose properly old paint. Paints, solvents and thinners have to be disposed at an appropriate household waste facility. Do not dispose of paint or chemical containers in regular dumpsters. | + | |
| - | ==== 5.3 Economical ==== | + | |
| - | „Maintaining high and stable levels of economic growth is one of the key objectives of sustainable development. Abandoning economic growth is not an option. But sustainable development is more than just economic growth. The quality of growth matter as well as the quantity“. [(EconomicSustainability)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In terms of economical sustainability in total, we can say that it is more than just an increasing GDP in the economy. It includes a wide range of indicators such as investment, interest rates, productivity, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our product will be build with components from Portugal and also 100% manufactured here. This will reduce the cost of transportation and also increase the employment rate as we are focused to employ Portuguese people. In our production we will try to reduce the usage of electricity and water involved to improve our " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our aim is to improve our sustainable manufacturing practice, viewed as production methods and technologies that focus on economic development and environmental protection simultaneously. The development of sustainable manufacturing practice is seen in three different stages: product, process and system. At the product level, the aim is to use the 6r approach (reduce, reuse, recycle, recover, | + | |
| - | A number of studies, performed in different countries with using various statistical methods and techniques, found that integration of social and environmental aspects into technical and organizational activities undertaken by firms would increase economic performance. For example focusing on energy efficiency, water conservation, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 5.4 Social ==== | + | |
| - | Social Sustainability is defined as “the ability of a community to develop processes and structures which not only meet the needs of its current members but also support the ability of future generations to maintain a healthy community.”[(socialsustainability)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | In this context we will try to operate in a way to satisfy the needs of our costumers while manufacturing the product respectively concerned about the nature and its reproductive capabilities. We need to ensure that the nature is preserved over a long period of time and the normative claims of social justice, human dignity and participation are fulfilled.[(llorente2009virtual)] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.4.1 Work Schemes === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 5.4.1.1 Evaluation == | + | |
| - | Social sustainability and its management have achieved a greater impact for maintaining good relations towards employees, customers and the society. For maintaining a fair and good relation towards our employees we want to implement an evaluation system. This will help us to quantify the amount of work an employee has done and fairly install a bonus and recognition evaluation. Promotion has to be made upon the contribution made towards achieving company goals. Many times it is rather a subjective decision not based on qualifications. The evaluation will be held once a month and consists of quickly answerable questions that can be marked by a scale from 1-10. Line managers with a lower span of control than 15 people should always make the evaluation. This will ensure a close contact towards the colleagues. The next higher management level etc. will evaluate the line managers. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Also in relation to the evaluation system and the fact to ensure fair promotion on basis of commitment we want to install incentives. These incentives can be variable, from extra days off, up to money bonuses. On the other hand it is possible to reward with trainings and seminars to improve the qualifications and reduce at the same time the accidents due to higher qualified worker. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 5.4.1.2 Health == | + | |
| - | We want to install a health care system in the company. Once or twice a week we want a doctor to come to our company and do health checks for our employees. This will be on an optional basis for them as a service by the company. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The work environment is a vital ethos for our company, as we want our employees to feel adequately safe in there position. Implementing continuous training seasons and refresher courses will see the accident rate in work lower to zero. In addition external auditors will evaluate our safety scheme to ensure all areas are covered and employee satisfaction is exceptionally high. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 5.4.1.2 Family == | + | |
| - | Another approach will be to become a family friendly company. In terms of being family friendly we want to build up for example cooperation with kinder gardens and install flexible working shifts. If we can offer good kinder gardens for our employees, they will feel confident that their kids are well and in good surrounding. This will improve the identification with our company and increase the willingness to commit towards their work. Additionally it is today quiet often possible to pay a certain percentage of your monthly wage into a fund held by the company. When working for a long time at this company you get a pension payment back, which will increase the income when the employee retires. This is a great chance for employees to finance themselves for the time after working respectively if the governmental security system is not able to finance the retirement of people anymore. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 5.4.1.3 Additional == | + | |
| - | Next if our company will start to grow and strengthen its position in the market we want to try to support our employees in finding accommodations and subsidize local transport tickets. On the one hand it will be easier for our employees to life close to the company or use an environmentally friendlier way to get to work. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 5.4.1.4 Auditing == | + | |
| - | Another approach of ensuring social sustainability in terms of the society aspect will be to participate in a European Auditing Scheme. It is called “Eco Management and Audit Scheme” (EMAS) and consists of the idea to voluntarily audit your own company by externals in terms of eco efficient management. After the audit we will be a certified company that fulfills more than the obligations made by the government. By publishing our report about the organizational effects on the environment we will be transparent for the stakeholders and also be held officially responsible for the goals we prescribe upon. To guarantee that we will achieve these goals we will install an environmental officer that will supervise and correct the production when getting “off the track”. However, our company will strive to accomplish the ISO 14001 as well. The EMAS is more or less an additional commitment based on ISO 14001. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 5.4.1.5 Education == | + | |
| - | On going to our social commitment we want to source our products locally and strengthen the local economy. Also there is the possibility to support the community by holding seminars and presentations at local universities. We can teach student about work experiences and send engineers to the universities to speak about naval engineering and design. This will also increase our reputation at the young professionals and improve the accessibility to get highly qualified students in our company, maybe also by internships. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 5.5 Life Cycle Analysis ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.5.1 Extraction of Raw Materials === | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | Analysis and quantification of the main components for the boat will be reviewed thoroughly. Highlighting which raw materials, energy and resources are used throughout the production and transportation processes. In our case we can mend the use of wood for the main structure of the boat, which is a renewable source of material. Any other material considerations will be under a great amount of scrutiny to verify the best possible selection for our project. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.5.2 Design Process === | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | Initially the unique design of a model boat is required which will be manufactured and it will have low environmental loaded activity, the design phase is not usually considered into the system. | + | |
| - | However, the components that it contain can take part on the environmental affect in our case. Our idea has been to reduce the quantity of material furthermore to provide the boat with the proper form and with some energy sources that will not affect the environment. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.5.3 Manufacturing and Production === | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | The production includes all stages from materials to the final product. It contains materials, input processes (energy, water etc.), output processes (waste, emissions etc.) | + | |
| - | The idea is to reduce the manufacturing and production consumption, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.5.4 Packaging and Distribution === | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | The distribution plan for the product from our manufacturing warehouse to the final user is described below. The plan is to produce the boat in a place near the sea and in the principle country to use it, which in our case is Portugal, to avoid the use of transport. However, if in a future we have some international customers, the idea is to design a special package for those boats, as these are not so big so we will fill a truck, train, boat or plane with the maximum capacity and find the best route for our distribution employees to successfully deliver the product on time and perfect condition. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.5.5 Customer Use and Maintenance === | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | The user lifetime with the boat proceeds here, During this phase users’ profile and its behaviour is highly determinant. It is dependant on the level of expertise from the user and the intensity of which they use it. There is a variety of activities the boat may for fill therefore must all be analysed. The activities include, sailing, mooring, and maintenance. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | First of all the boat has to be designed in a form that needs as minimal maintenance possible, which requires a big consumption of energy, both in the technicians contraction as in the storage safety costs. One of our points is to provide an easily understood manual to the consumers to let them take care and repair their own boat and reduce many costs. In addition, the way the users make the boat work can effect on the environmental impact so we also will provide a user guide to explain the best way to use the product. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 5.5.6 End of life === | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | The end of life includes disposal and recycling of waste materials. Once the user decides the end of life of the product there are several possibilities they can perform for the final treatment. Disposal documentation is required, as a company we have signed an agreement to accept boats at the disposal stage to recycle and use available components in newer products. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | If the owner chooses to recycle them selfs then a controlling method for the end of our product has been implemented, | + | |
| - | ==== 5.6 Our Company Policy ==== | + | |
| - | Reviewing the statements made throughout this chapter of the report it is now our company policy to manage of its activities so as to ensure that the consumption of energy and natural resources is reduced to a practical minimum. Our company’s corporate mission is to provide: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Advance our technologies & solutions | + | |
| - | * The best possible facilities and highest level of customer service our tenants | + | |
| - | * Help customers effectively | + | |
| - | * Limit the environmental impact | + | |
| - | * Maximum value to our shareholders | + | |
| - | * A rewarding work environment to our employees | + | |
| - | * Work together with relative companies for mutual benefit | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In pursuit of this mission, our company will strive to achieve a world-class reputation for energy management. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Energy management will play a key role in our business. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Provide the best possible environment for occupants of our facilities, while simultaneously maximizing energy performance | + | |
| - | Reduce operating expenses and increase asset values by actively and responsibly managing energy consumption | + | |
| - | Demonstrate commitment to our community and leadership in the real estate industry, by reducing pollution associated with energy use. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Horizon Sails will endeavor to meet or exceed the following energy management targets in service to these objectives: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Reduce energy consumption in existing buildings by 35% over a 5-year period | + | |
| - | * Reduce energy intensity by 25% in existing buildings over a 5-year period | + | |
| - | * Design and construct all new developments to achieve 40% energy savings over local building energy codes | + | |
| - | * Reduce carbon emissions associated with energy consumption by 33% by 2018 | + | |
| - | * Earn and maintain the ENERGY STAR label for 55% of our portfolio, beginning in 2020 and reapplying for and maintaining the labels each year thereafter also, publicly disclose them as appropriate or requested | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This policy shall apply to all properties, business units, employees, and contractors in services in relation to our company. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 5.7 Conclusion ==== | + | |
| - | In conclusion to this chapter, Eco-eficiency Measures for Sustainability, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | All these elements position us as a prominent player in the global environmental transition: a corporate culture enabling the company to generate competitive advantage. To follow this path and grow our business in the medium and long term means the involvement of every manager, employee and partner, individually and collectively in a work management strategy. In the next chapter the ethical and deontological concerns of a business culture will be highlighted and advanced, allowing us to deliver a broad understanding of what is right and wrong on several platforms of ethics. | + | |
| - | ===== 6. Ethical and Deontological Concerns ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 6.1 Introduction ==== | + | |
| - | In this chapter, we are going to outline the importance of a strong ethical basis in our business. Our main object will be to explain our ethical concerns in terms of engineering ethics, sales and marketing ethics, academic ethics, environmental ethics and liability of our sailing boat. Whenever setting up a new business idea and entering the market, you are in many ways confronted with ethical questions regarding the ways you operate. Ethical questions arise already in the ideation phase of a new product where you deal with core questions regarding your materials and the functioning itself. All ongoing steps will have an impact on the environment and also on humans that are in direct contact with the production process or by using it. These various situation are characterized by multifaceted decisions which will lead in a wrong direction when not, in terms of ethics, are thought through. Furthermore they are hardly reversible and shape an image in the customer minds. As our ethical action will enhance trust and good relation with customers, suppliers and other businesses it is a core process for our effective development and strong positioning in the market. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 6.2 Engineering Ethics ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Whenever you are designing a new product and thinking about the functioning as well as its components you are obliged to think also about the effect on the environment and user of the product. Our civilization is based on engineering and its progress. New technologies enable us to be more efficient, faster but also may involve negative side effects on the environment and human health. In consequence it needs some rules or guidelines that apply to engineering processes. There are standards of good practice set and formulated in a " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(1)** Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public. In order to ensure safety, health and welfare of the public, we will design a boat that will be safe to use for any customer and also not be a threat when fulfilling its missions offshore. We will use highest standard of technology to minimize the threat of an unnavigable boat. Furthermore we focused our material research on sustainable factors and also to care about the recycling at the end of its lifetime. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(2)** Perform services only in areas of their competence. To due the fact that non of us has a profound background in naval engineering we try to keep in close contact with specialists from divers engineering fields. This will ensure a high level of competence and quality in performing the prototyping. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(3)** Act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees. It is important for us to remain our good teamwork on this project in the future. Only by a free flow of information regarding the product we will create a successful working atmosphere. However, this free information flow will be useful to enhance a feeling of participation for the professionals in the company who will benefit from new ideas. The success of an innovative product lies in the commitment of every professional employee. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **(4)** Professionals within the company will conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, | + | |
| - | ==== 6.3 Sales and Marketing Ethics ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | As the desire to make fast money is getting more and more important in our daily life, we see an alarming trend growing in business society. Many marketing and sales activities are based on these selfish and ruthless principles such as, focusing solely on the singularly most important sales activity to accelerate growth. Our company wants to instead be transparent and achieve a long term relation with our clients. Therefore we will be consistent in our marketing strategy and honest about our product. Additionally we will not use any advertisement strategies that includes to talk other competitor products down. This approach will enhance a profound image of the company, enlarge our authenticity and also the customer confidence. Furthermore we strive to manufacture a high quality product offered to fair prices. When doing advertisements our potential customer will get the information needed on the technology, functionality and the way of manufacturing it. This will provide him with a solid basis to decide himself if to purchase or not and if the product reaches his expectations. Issuing public statements is vital to perform the objective in a truthful manner. We want to only present our company and product in a fair manner. We have to ensure that we only state proven facts about the product that we can be held responsible for. Finally, instead of promising our customers some features and benefits of our product that can not be delivered we want to try to get an understatement. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 6.4 Academic Ethics ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Due to our various study backgrounds at have only a little relation to the topic of naval engineering, | + | |
| - | Our software used will be only based on free ware to avoid any licensing problems. Furthermore we are working in a group of people from different countries. This implies that we are used to different ways of working and have been raised surrounded by different cultures. Also we may have different aims and expectations of our goals regarding the project. Nevertheless we will try to work as a team by respecting the others and fulfilling each task at our best. | + | |
| - | Regarding the relation to our coordinators and teachers in class we will confront them with respect and work in class when asked to. Also we will prepare our meetings and homework for class. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 6.5 Environmental Ethics ==== | + | |
| - | The point of environmental ethics concerns the fact of our ecological footprint. This means that every product has a certain impact on the environment and future generations living on this planet. Our mission is to minimize this ecological footprint in order to preserve the nature and manage to maintain a livable condition. The ethical approach should be to focus the design on reusable material and also think about the end of the lifecycle of the product. This means that our company wants to offer a recycling/ disassembly of the boat or components when not functioning anymore at our costs. To avoid that this is happening early in the life cycle we will only use high quality material and ensure that our product is as less harmful to the environment as possible. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The material selection process was intensive and time consuming to ensure the best quality of product for the customer. A vast array of possible materials were highly scrutinised for each component, and compared individually. The final selection process was deeply deliberated and cooporated fully with our companies ethos and ethical demands for the environment, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 6.6 Liability ==== | + | |
| - | As a matter of fact the autonomous sailboat can also be a hazard for others when being out of control or capsizing. This may involve people or the ocean environment. Also we can be hold liable for the promised quality and warranty given. This is why we will exactly define the terms of our warranty and let it be checked by legislative authority. If there are any customer complaints occurring we need to find a reasonable way to satisfy both sides and remain our relationship in a respecting way. Furthermore we will enclose a user manual for our product to guide the customer along the functioning of the boat and also point out the hazards that are involved by using it. | + | |
| - | Next we have to maintain safety standards at our production, to protect our employees and also for ensuring safety when operating in sea. Some directives regarding our product are: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Machine Directive (2006/42/CE 2006-05-17); | + | |
| - | * Electrical Safety: Low Level Voltage Directive (2006/95/CE 2006-12-12); | + | |
| - | * Restriction of Hazardous Substances (ROHS) in Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (2002/95/EC 2003-01-27); | + | |
| - | * Mandatory adoption and use of the International System of Units (The NIST International Guide for the use of the International System of Units). | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Additionally we need to be aware of copyrights, trademarks and patents and must not infringe these. Therefore we designed a logo ourselves and checked on the " | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Last but not least we will follow the legal framework provided by the EU and the local governments. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 6.7 Conclusion ==== | + | |
| - | Summing up this chapter we see that there are various ethical dimensions that we need to take into consideration. On the engineering code of conduct aspect, we have implemented safe enviroments for our knowledgable associates, working in intensively researched areas while holding these employees to there actions in the work place. Secondly, the sales and marketing platform will perform honestly towards connections with the company, from suppliers to customers, holding our actions acccountable and operating to our statement in all advertisments. The academic ethical principles relies on our gathering of information which will always come from reliable sources which will be accounted for accordingly in the biliography. This also includes open-ware softwere and any other platforms which will be used in the development of the project. As the basis of our company we have implemented values for the interaction in the organisation itself and towards our environment. Adopting fully recycleable methods and astute intropective material choices to ensure a lower ecological footprint. Finally, the liability factor will adhere to standards developed internationally, | + | |
| - | ===== 7 Project Development ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 7.1 Introduction ==== | + | |
| - | In this chapter we are going to document our progress in the project of the autonomous sailboat. The autonomous sailboat is required to mainly be a data collector that can autonomously navigate and fulfill its mission in a prior defined region. We take the requirements and objectives defined by our client LSA into account when designing our boat. All our solutions for these approaches, we will sum up regarding the best ways to build the hull, sail, rudder, mast etc. Additionally we defined functional tests that we will do when finishing the prototype, all our results will be displayed here in this chapter. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 7.2 Architecture ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.2.1 Initial Concept === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our first idea was to focus on the paralympics 2.4 model, which is stable and almost unsinkable, we produced a 3D model to see how we could modify it for our goals. However we quickly realized that it was so far from what we needed. It did not incorporate the required rigid wing-sail, thus using a standard soft sail and rigging which is to cumbersome for our design. This model is designed for racing in a determined waters and in a delimited short circuit and our boat has to be able to sail in every conditions for a long time, so we decided to rule out the idea. Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel109> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.2.2 Secondary Concept === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The second concept on which the team considered all parameters of the the design requirements. It was decided to focus on stability and precision when designing the hull, keel and rudder and experimentation when designing the rigid wing-sail. Our hull concept can be seen below, it has several features which compliment the requirements of our boat. Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel110> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.2.2.1 Hull and Keel == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The hull design was adopted from the variety of concepts which allow for the best possible design for our boat requirements, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel111> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The hull has design has been made to accommodate the stability requirements of the boat when in operation in unstable waters, the V hull design adds to this stability and control. Additionally the keel design is also there for the stability of the boat this is more advanced which considers the forces on the wing sail when selecting a depth for the keel. These calculations can be seen in the following section. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel112> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The hull and keel design have been presented below on a Solidworks 3D model, extra advancements such as the deck and several other components must be added to this for the final body of the boat. At this time our concentration is lying in the design, construction and testing of the rigid wing sail. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel113> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.2.2.2 Rigid Wing-Sail == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | After relying on our hull design to be taken from a lazer our concentration is now to develop a rigid wing sail which can be accommodated by a boat of this size. The lazer dimensions can be seen in the table below. The rigid wing has a structurally stable design with limited but not zero flexibility, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel114> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.2.2.3 Ribs == | + | |
| - | The ribs are the structural skeleton of the wing-sail, thus great care must be taken when designing such an important component. Vast amounts of research has been produced for the aviation industry, this lead us to the NACA 0012. This airfoil design is symmetrical and reasonably easy to produce initally coordinates were plotted on basic graph paper and later transferred to a excel sheet where the figures could be analysed before being transferred to a 2D Model. Below we can see the initial plotted diagram and the coordinates of the NACA 0012 airfoil. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel115> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Table {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel14> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Once the the coordinates had been validated they were transferred on to solidworks software, here the ribs were modified to accommodate the mast and I-Beam structural supports. The ability to modify the profile of the ribs was also an option below it can be seen that large amounts of material have been removed from the rib, this does lower stability but it also lowers the weight of the sail. The reduction in weight should produce a greater lift and enhance our sails performance while maintaining the structural efficiency. The rib geometry has also has changed to straight alignments to ease the manufacturing process of the sail. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel116> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.2.3 Electronic Architecture === | + | |
| - | It is paramount that the configuration of electrical appliances is predetermined due to our proposed manufacturing process. The system will be enclosed in the skin of the wing this causes great difficulty to renovate the system within the sail. The prospected components to be inserted to the product are as follows: | + | |
| - | * Battery | + | |
| - | * Navigating Lights | + | |
| - | * Actuator | + | |
| - | * Wind Sensor | + | |
| - | * Servo Motor | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | (SCHEMATIC INPUT HERE) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This electrical design will let us test the system under certain conditions and ensure our design can accommodate these electronic appliances in terms of positioning and connections. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 7.3 Calculations ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The calculations cover all sections stated in the state of the art, these are as follows, Buoyancy, Dynamic Stability, Velocity of the Wind and Centre of Gravity. These calculations clarify the boats ability to operate correctly with the dimensions of the lazer hull, which can define the weight of the sail to achieve equilibrium in the boat. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===7.4.1 Buyoancy=== | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel117> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We assumed the hull as a rectangle to semplify calculations, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===7.4.2 Dynamic Stability=== | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel118> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The calculation sheet above ensures stability of the boat where we have assumed a Centre of Gravity at at 0.4 metres from the base of the hull. We calculated the lift of the wing necessary to reach a resulting moment in the Centre of Gravity equal to zero. The value of lift is found to be 790N. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.4.3 Velocity of the Wind === | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel119> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Now that the lift of the wing has been found we can use this to achieve the maximum wind speed the boat may operate under. This was be found using the Lift Coefficient Equation. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.4.4 Fixing Centre of Gravity === | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel120> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | To reach a stable boat it is fundamental to have a low centre of gravity, fixed as said above at 0.4 metres from the bottom of the hull. We used this value to calculate the weight of the wing. It can be seen to be 3 kilograms which is not great enough to produce with our budget and materials available. The distance between the hull and keel and the keel weight has been increased to 1m and 120 kg, which improved the sail weight to 12kg. This value is viable and available for the process and materials we will later select in the project development. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.4.5 Modifications and Conclusion === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We modified some datas from the initial model to reach a better results; we took height, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Assuming a hull length of $4,208 m$ a hull heigth of $0,379 m $, a beam hull of $1,34 m%$ we reach a volume of $ 0,931 {m}^{3} $ and a rectangle volume of $5,927 {m}^{3} $ | + | |
| - | * Assuming a Sail weight of $16 kg$, hull weight of $59 kg$, keel and rudder of $100 kg $, and equipment weight of $50 kg$ we reach a total weight of $225 kg$. | + | |
| - | Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | TotalWeight=Sail+Hull+KeelandRudder+Equipment= 59 kg + 100 kg + 50 kg = 225 kg. | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | * The Impulse is calculated in Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Impulse = Weight\times10= 225kg\times10 \frac{m}{{s}^{2}} = 2250 N | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | * Assuming a Density of water of $1027 \frac{kg}{{m}^{3}}$, | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | VUW=\frac{Impulse}{Density\hspace{0, | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | * To analyse the moments,we use the scheme of the Figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | The condition for the dynamic stability is given by Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | We assume an angle of attack of $60°$. The Weight moment is in Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Weight \times Arm = Weight \times 0 = 0. | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | The Lift water moment is given in Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Lift\hspace{0, | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | The Impulse moment is divided into two components; the first is given by Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Impulse \times cos{(Angle\hspace{0, | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | The second is given by Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Impulse \times sin{(Angle\hspace{0, | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | After this we reach The lift wing moment using the \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Lift\hspace{0, | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | * Assuming an height of the center of gravity of $0,4 m $ and an height of the centre of pressure of the wing of $ 1,2 m $, we reach a Lift of the wing given by Equation \ref{eq: | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | Lift = \frac {Moment\hspace{0, | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | * Considering a Density of air of $1,23 \frac{kg}{{m}^{3}}$, | + | |
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | \begin{equation} | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | \end{equation} | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | * Utilizing a Hull Height of $0,37 m$, a Hull weight of $59 kg$, a Bulb weight of $100 kg$, a Sail Height of $2,4 m$, a distance beetween bottom of the hull and CG of $0,4m$, a distance beetween the centre of the hull and CG of $0,585 m$, a distance beetween the keel and CG of $0,6 m$, and a distance beetween the sail and the CG of $1,57 m$ we obtain a Sail weight of $16,232 kg$. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This is the final model, in Excel version and in paper version. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel121> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ====7.4 Possible Coverage Materials and Manufacture Processes==== | + | |
| - | In this section the manufacturing processes for several materials will be scrutinised individually to develop a well thought out material for the sail coverage area. The comparison of materials is our main consideration as this will need lightweight, | + | |
| - | * Manual Lamination | + | |
| - | * Wood Assembly & Bonding | + | |
| - | * Metal Assembly and Bonding | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===7.4.1 Manual Lamination=== | + | |
| - | The first idea was to build a wing sail in composites materials with the process of manual lamination. The manual lamination is the older and easier process for composites materials. The dry fibers, which may be of different types from glass to carbon, in the form of unidirectional, | + | |
| - | The last layer is generally laminated with a layer of peel-ply, that is, a film that has releasing properties and has the function of absorbing part of the excess resin, ensuring a better surface finish and protect the surface from contamination in the event that the product both left catalyze in poorly cleaned. | + | |
| - | The mold is said female if the fibers are arranged within it, male if they are arranged on them; or, in the case of lamination of a hull of a vessel, the contact surface of the mold will be the inner surface in the case of a male mold, the outer surface in the case of the female mold. Considering that the contact surface of the mold generally has a much smoother finish than the other, it follows that to achieve the same level of finishing vessel produced in the male mold will require a greater number of hours of work than using a female mold. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==7.4.1.1 Fiberglass== | + | |
| - | Fibreglass is small glass filaments, they consist mostly of silicon oxides which are layered together to produce a high strength to weight ratio. The spectrum of its characteristics can be modified by mixed with other oxides such as aluminum or magnesium. The glass filaments are classified according to the type of glass used for manufacturing, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The advantages of this material are extensive, from high strength to weight ratio with a increased life and is structurally and dimensionally stable under substantial loads. These advantages does come at a cost, the price is increasingly greater than other prospected materials and the fibreglass might be wasted somewhat due to our inexperience in working with such a material. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==7.4.1.2 Resine== | + | |
| - | Resins are plastic materials consisting of polymers of a high molecular weight. The polymer can be used without additives, these are added in order to improve properties mechanical, thixotropic or modify any other characteristic. Some of the characteristics that these polymers are their low weight, electrical insulation, corrosion resistant and adhesive properties. The main function of the resin or matrix, is to support the applied load and transmit the reinforcement through the interface, for this matrix must be deformable. It must also protect fibres and keep the external environment and tightly bound. The resins may be thermoplastic or thermoset, depending on whether or not crosslinking present. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We will focus on thermosetting resins, can be classified according to their properties | + | |
| - | into three groups : | + | |
| - | * Epoxy is known in the marine manifactures for its good toughness and bonding strength. Quality epoxy resins stick to materials with 2, | + | |
| - | * Vinyl ester are stronger than polyester resins and cheaper than epoxy resins. Vinyl ester resins use a polyester resin type of cross-linking molecules in the bonding process. | + | |
| - | * Polyester | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Although all of these thermosetting resins may be suitable corresponding to our weight it lacks the ability to perform adequate structural support to the wing. Its flexural tendencies is to great for the wing-sail and may easily damage in operating conditions, also the plastics may deteriorate overtime due to its inability to withstand UV rays. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.4.1.3 Mylar == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The Mylar A has an average tensile strength of about 190 MPa, and excellent moisture resistance to most chemicals and withstands temperatures from -70°C to + 150°C. Because it contains no plasticisers, | + | |
| - | This is the material that could be used to cover and giving continuity to the sail over the composite structure. It also has its flaws as Mylar can easily rip, if this was to happen in operation the boat may lack the ability to manoeuvre and must be retrieved in open ocean or other surroundings. It is also a problem to apply the Mylar to the wing due to the wings size and the lack of equipment such as a heat gun. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===7.4.2 Cutting and Bonding Wood=== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The second idea is to use wood, in particular maritime plywood for the main structure, or rather for the ribs and the first skin. Marine plywood is a particular type of plywood that is commonly used in marine applications. It is composed from select grades of wood. Using this type of plywood can provide you with a number of benefits. A good quality marine plywood sail, well constructed and protected will be immensely strong and last a lifetime. Plywood is particularly pliable, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Adhesives will be a primary fastener for the wooden structure, there is a wide selection of glue on the market therefore our selection must be rigorous and very selective to ensure it meets all the specifications to withstand the environments it will be subjected too. The adhesive must be very strong, waterproof, and suitable for exterior use and, to some extent, solvent tolerant. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel4> | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 800px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Product ^ Type ^ Specification ^ Cost ^ | + | |
| - | | [[http:// | + | |
| - | | [[http:// | + | |
| - | |[[http:// | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The [[http:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Features and Benefits** | + | |
| - | * Elastic | + | |
| - | * High mechanical load capacity | + | |
| - | * Can be used in spatula application | + | |
| - | * Tolerance gapping | + | |
| - | * Vibration dampening | + | |
| - | * Hydrolysis resistant | + | |
| - | * Solvent free | + | |
| - | * Wide adhesion range | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabel4> | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 600px center> | + | |
| - | ^Technical Properties^ ::: ^ | + | |
| - | |Colours |White| | + | |
| - | |Tack-free time*|40 minutes approx.| | + | |
| - | |Elongation at break| 300% approx. | | + | |
| - | |Tensile-shear strength|2.0 MPa approx.| | + | |
| - | |Tensile strength| 2.0 MPa approx.| | + | |
| - | |Application temperature |+10°C to +40°C| | + | |
| - | |Service temperature (continuous) short term (up to 4 hours)| -40°C to +90°C +120 °C | | + | |
| - | |Shelf life (stored below 25°C) Method of application|12 months Hand- or air- gun| | + | |
| - | (* = at 23°C and 50% relative humidity) | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Sikaflex 292 is chemically resistant to fresh water, seawater, limewater, sewage effluent, dilute acids and caustic solutions; temporarily resistant to fuels, mineral oils, vegetable and animal fats and oils; not resistant to organic acids, alcohol, concentrated mineral acids and caustic solutions or solvents. Brief contact with fuels and lubricants has no significant effect. [http:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.4.3 Working with Metal === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.4.3.1 Aluminium === | + | |
| - | Metallic aluminum has many properties that make it useful in a wide range of applications. It is lightweight, | + | |
| - | * **Marking** | + | |
| - | * A scribe is a tool with a sharp edge that can be used to make straight markings on a metal surface, the use of this for our scale will be time consuming and lack a degree of accuracy. To mark hole positioning a center punch can be used, this is a sharp-pointed rod made of iron and is used to mark positions for drilling holes. In this case, the center punch is hammered in deep using a mallet to form a dent; this dent helps to keep the drill bit in place and to avoid slipping when drilling. | + | |
| - | * **Cutting** | + | |
| - | * Hand-held saws can be used for wood or hacksaws used for iron are quite adaptable to work on aluminum with a little tweaking in the choice of blades. The blades used when working with aluminum have to be wide-mouthed and made of high carbide, like with wood. This helps to keep the saw clear of burs and to give precise cuts. If cuts have to be made quickly and with less precision a guillotine may be used to cut small lengths with ease. | + | |
| - | * **Drilling** | + | |
| - | * Since aluminum is a softer metal, it has the tendency to clog the drill bit. So the drill bit used when working with aluminum has to be the type with wide spirals. Hand-held drills, the kind in which you can change the drill bit manually, both electric and manual, are great to work with on aluminum. In our circumstances industrial pillar drills can be used in the ISEP workshop that has a more precise jig for more accurate drilling. | + | |
| - | * **Bonding** | + | |
| - | * Aluminum can be bonded in a number of ways, from adhesive bonding riveting, bolt and screw. The adhesive process would mean the casing for the aluminum is sealed with great difficulty to separate when upgrades are required. The riveting process would be time consuming but offer a clean finish on the product maintaining the surface finish at its finest for the airfoil profile. Bolt and screw bonding is the best for DFA and DFD processes but takes a large quantity of time calculating and position the connection points without wing failure. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.4.4 Conclusion=== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **REWORK** | + | |
| - | Analyzing these three different possiblities, | + | |
| - | * Wood is cheaper. With a limited budget the price of the raw materials is an important factor. Our Sail will be of considerable dimensions, and the quantity of material is remarkable as well. | + | |
| - | * Wood is easier to work. Instead of composites, wood doesn' | + | |
| - | * Wood is easy-purchasing. Different kind of wood and all the related tools are present in most of the Do-It-Yourself local shops like Leroy Merlin and Aki. | + | |
| - | * Aluminum could be used in our case for the mast, because aluminum is lighter than stainless steel, and for structural pieces mixed with wood pieces or composite pieces. | + | |
| - | ==== 7.5 Components ==== | + | |
| - | After reviewing possible manufacturing processes | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.5.1 Masts === | + | |
| - | == 7.5.1.1 Metal Mast == | + | |
| - | The Mast is the most important structural piece in our wing sail. It has the function to support all the profiles, to support the wind pressure and to transmit it to the hull. It has been decided in the previous chapter to develop a mast of two different materials to preserve the weight of the sail. The first metre of the mast will be constructed of metal and the remainder wood, the metal options are listed and compared in the table below. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe15> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 650px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Property ^ Stainless Steel 316L vs. Aluminium | + | |
| - | | Strength & Malleability | + | |
| - | | Cost | The price of steel and aluminum is continually fluctuating based on global supply and demand, fuel costs and the price and availability of iron and bauxite ore; however steel is generally cheaper than aluminum. The cost of raw materials has a direct impact on the price of the finished spinning. | | + | |
| - | | Corrosion Resistance | + | |
| - | | Weight | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | It is a clear decision to use stainless steel 316L due to these points stated above, the strength of the material opposed to aluminium is a better fit for our design purpose. Now deciding a diameter and thickness of a stainless steel mast is our task, the material sourced has a Yield Strength of ${290}$ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | $ I=\frac { pi }{d}^{4}{ \64 } = \frac { pi }{do}^{4}-{di}^{4} \64 } $ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.5.1.2 Wooden Mast == | + | |
| - | A wooden mast has been developed to reduce the weight of the wing sail while maintaining structural stability, it will take the form of an I Beam. To ensure structural stability and to avoid failure we will calculate the moment of inertia required for the mast to withstand the following forces with the wood property, we assume the following: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Maximum allowable wind pressure of $500 \frac{N}{{m}^{2}}$ . | + | |
| - | * Tensile strength of wood to be ${60}$ | + | |
| - | * Area of the sail (starting from the 3rd rib to the last) of $ 1.33 m^2 $ and an height of the centre of pressure of $0.7$ m | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | These assumed values can be used to calculate | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * The moment will be $ 500 \frac{N}{{m}^{2}} \times 1,33 {m}^{2} = 669 N \rightarrow 669\times 0.7 = 468$ Nm | + | |
| - | * Modulus of resistance is equal to $W=\frac { M }{ \sigma | + | |
| - | * With a width of the rib of $0.19 m$ we reach $I_=\frac { M\times Y }{ \sigma | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This value of $1.56\times { 10}^{ -6} {m}^{4}$ is the minimum value acceptable for the Moment of Inertia, therefore we must source and build materials to specific sizes to overcome this value. The design requires two I Beam masts, one for the main sail and the other for the stabilizer. In figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel122> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Our central piece of plywood with a thickness of $ 8 mm $ will have an $ {I}^{A}=\frac { b\times{ h }^{ 3 } }{ 12 } =\frac { 0.008 \times 0.19 }{12 } = 2.6\times {10}^{-6} {m}^{3}$ | + | |
| - | * The 4 corner parts with a width and breadth of $ 0.01 m $ will have an ${I}^{B} = 4 \times 0.01m \times 0.01m \times {(\frac{0.19m}{2} - \frac {0.01m}{2})}^{2} = 0.0009585 {m}^{4} $ | + | |
| - | * $ {I}^{A}+{I}^{B}=0.0009876 {m}^{4} $ that is by far bigger than $\frac{1.56\times {10}^{ -6} {m}^{4}}{0, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Now the stabilizer mast calculation can be found below along with figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel123> | + | |
| - | {{ : | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Our central piece of plywood with a thickness of $ 4 mm $ will have an $ {I}^{A}=\frac { b\times{ h }^{ 3 } }{ 12 } =\frac { 0.004 \times 0.19 }{12 } = 2.6\times {10}^{-6} {m}^{3}$ | + | |
| - | * The 4 corner parts with a width and breadth of $ 0.01 m $ will have an ${I}^{B} = 4 \times 0.01m \times 0.01m \times {(\frac{0.19m}{2} - \frac {0.01m}{2})}^{2} = 0.0009585 {m}^{4} $ | + | |
| - | * $ {I}^{A}+{I}^{B}=0.0009876 {m}^{4} $ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.5.2 Coverage === | + | |
| - | The previous chapter has allowed us to select maritime plywood as our skin coverage of the sail. Primarily | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe15> | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 500px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Property ^ Maritime Plywood | + | |
| - | | Weight | The sourced | + | |
| - | |Waterproof| Plywood used in boats and sails must be made with waterproof, although considered ‘maritime’ it can still be damaged by the environment. Also the bonding adhesive must be waterproof, otherwise the structure will fail. | | + | |
| - | | Applying | Plywood applications will be difficult | + | |
| - | |Structural strength| Plywood | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We opted in this case for the maritime plywood mainly for its high resistance given to the structure. However as mentioned above, a complete skin in plywood means a weight of $\frac{SailArea}{PlywoodDensity \times Thickness} = \frac {5.2 {m}^{2}}{540 kg/{m}^{3} \times 4 mm} = 2.4 kg $ . To save some weight we cut the plywood skin in prossimity of the ribs and we use plates of 2mm Balsa. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.5.2.1 Balsa == | + | |
| - | Balsa lumber is very soft and light, with a rude, open grain. The density of dry balsa wood ranges from 40–340 kg/m3, with a typical density of about 160 kg/m3. It is generally very easy to work with potentially no dulling effect on cutters; yet because of its extremely low density, fuzzy surfaces can be a problem when using dull cutters. Balsa generally should not be used to hold nails, with glue being the preferred method of joining. Balsa stains and finishes well, though it has a tendency to soak up large quantities of material on the initial coats. High quality Balsa can be rather expensive when purchased at hobby stores or other specialty outlets. Larger boards and lumber sold through typical hardwood dealers is hard to find, but generally has a better cost per board-foot than other sources.[56] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.5.3 Ribs === | + | |
| - | The ribs are the structural integrity of the wingsail, without stability here the product will fail once manufactured. Great care has been taken researching materials and both maritime plywood and fiberglass. The structural bonding for both materials varies indefinitely, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | For the ribs we choose Maritime Plywood. It has good resistance, and the weight of the ribs is not so influencing in the entire structure. Plywood is cheaper and easier to work than Aluminum and Composites, although our main selection of this material was down to the accessibility. We will acquire the same material for the skin this it will be easily bought and cut to achieve the required sizes while maintaining the requirements to be structurally sound.The reason for not selecting composites is that they require a mold that is too expensive to manufacture for just one component and aluminium requires specific tools to work with, which we do not have access too. This shows the maritime plywood to be the best consideration for our wing-sail considering our level of experience and budget. The materials does has its flaws and will not be fully protected from the environment, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.5.4 Stabilizer === | + | |
| - | == 7.5.4.1 Stabilizer Beam == | + | |
| - | For the stabilizer beam are valid the same considerations we did above for the mast. We opted for three stainless steel bar, to have the same provider of the mast. We decided to have three pieces instead of one to have the possibility to regulate the length, with the purpose of balancing the weight of the stabilizer. We opted for a central part with a diameter of 33 millimeters, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.5.5 Electrical Devices === | + | |
| - | == 7.5.5.1 Battery == | + | |
| - | == 7.5.5.2 Navigation Lights == | + | |
| - | == 7.5.5.3 Wind Sensor == | + | |
| - | == 7.5.5.4 Supply Lines == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.5.6 Materials List === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The production of a materials list to quantify costs, quantity and weight of each material required to follow our planned design and manufacturing process, stated in the next section. Below a parts list, accumulated price list and finally the suppliers contact information can be seen in table format. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe15> | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 1100px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Part ^ Material ^ Quantity ^ Weight /unit (kg) ^ Total weight (kg) ^ Total weight utilized (kg) ^ Price/unit (€) ^ Total Price (€) ^ Supplier ^ | + | |
| - | | Mast | Stainless Steel (316L) (Tubo Inox Milimétrico) | 1 Cylinder (1000x70x3) | 5.033 | 5.033 | 5.033 | 5 | 5 | Tubinox | | + | |
| - | | I Beam Spars /Lateral Union | Wood (Pinho) | 6 Strips (2400x18x18) | 0.13 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 3.39 | 20.34 | AKI | | + | |
| - | | Stabiliser I Beam Spars | Ripa Aplainada | 1 Strips (2400x12x12) | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.1 | 1.79 | 1.79 | Leroy Merlin | | + | |
| - | | Ribs (Main Wing 8 & Stabilizer 4) | Maritime Plywood B/BB C3 (4mm) | 1 Plate (12 ribs) (3100x1530x4) | 11.19 | 11.19 | 2 | 66.67 | 66.67 | Madeivouga | | + | |
| - | | Wing Jib, skin & stabilizer cover | Maritime Plywood B/BB C3 (4mm) | 2 Plates (3100x1530x4) | 11.19 | 22.38 | 6 | 66.67 | 133.33 | Madeivouga | | + | |
| - | | Extra Wing Coverage | Balsa 2mm | 50 Plates (1000x100x2) | 0.032 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.69 | 84.50 | Leroy Merlin | | + | |
| - | | Hinge | Stainless Steel | Dobradica Piana Inox (1000mm) x2 | - | - | - | 6.92 | 13.84 | Leroy Merlin | | + | |
| - | | Stabilizer bar (1) | Stainless Steel (316L) | 1 Cylinder (1500x30x1.5) | 1.070 | 1.605 | 1.2 | 7.50 | 15 | Tubinox | | + | |
| - | | Stabilizer bar (2) | Stainless Steel (316L) | 1 Cylinder (1500x33x1.5) | 1.183 | 1.775 | 0.8 | 7.50 | 15 | Tubinox | | + | |
| - | | Mould | MDF | 2 Pieces (2440x1220x19) | - | - | - | 30.99 | 61.98 | Leroy Merlin | | + | |
| - | | Glue | Sikaflex 292(Polyurethane) | 3 Packs | - | - | - | 23 | 69 | Vitorinox | | + | |
| - | | Electric Linear Actuator EPCO http:// | + | |
| - | | Epoxy Paint | Titan Epoxy Paint | Primario Epoxy x1 | - | - | -| 23.29 | 23.29 | Leroy Merlin | | + | |
| - | | Polyurethane Paint | Titan Polyurethane Paint | Verniz Marinho Tinta Yate x1| -| - | - | 32.99 | 32.99 | Leroy Merlin | | + | |
| - | | Table Support for Manufacture | Cavalete Madeira 73 | Supports x3 | - | - | - | 3.49 | 10.47 | Leroy Merlin | | + | |
| - | | Glue Protection Layer | Rolo Filme Protetor | 1 Roll | - | - | - | 6.99 | 6.99 | Leroy Merlin | | + | |
| - | ^ Total | - | - | | ^ ≈ 18.1 kg | ^ € 641.40 | | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe15> | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 650px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Supplier ^ Unit ^ Quantity ^ Price ^ | + | |
| - | | www.Aki.pt | Stripes Pine Wood (2400x18x18) | 6 | € 20.34 | | + | |
| - | | www.leroymerlin.pt | Stripes Wood (2400x9x9) | 1 | € 1.69 | | + | |
| - | | www.leroymerlin.pt | MDF (2400x1220x19) | 2 | € 62.00 | | + | |
| - | | www.leroymerlin.pt | Balsa Panels (1000x100x2) | 50 | € 84.50 | | + | |
| - | | www.leroymerlyn.pt | Dobradica Piana Inox (1000 mm) | 2 | € 13.84 | | + | |
| - | | www.leroymerlin.pt | Primario Epoxy for wood | 1 | € 23.00 | | + | |
| - | | www.leroymerlin.pt | Verniz Marinho Tinta Yate | 1 | € 31.00 | | + | |
| - | | www.leroymerlin.pt | Cavalete Madeira 73 | 3 | € 10.47 | | + | |
| - | | www.leroymerlin.pt | Rolo Filme Protetor (0.50x220 m) | 1 | € 6.99 | | + | |
| - | | www.festo.com | Linear Actuator (Stroke ?/ Force ?) | 1 | € ??? | | + | |
| - | | www.madeivouga.com | Maritime Plywood - B/BB C3 (4 mm) (3100x1530x4) | 3 | € 200.00 | | + | |
| - | | www.tubinox.pt | Stainless steel tube (1000x70x3) | 1 | € 5.00 | | + | |
| - | | www.tubinox.pt | Stainless steel tube (1500x30x1.5) | 1 | € 7.50 | | + | |
| - | | www.tubinox.pt | Stainless steel tube (1500x33x1.5) | 1 | € 7.50 | | + | |
| - | | www.vitorinox.pt | Sikaflex 292 | 3 | € 69.00 | | + | |
| - | ^ Total | | 77 ^ € _____ | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe15> | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 850px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Supplier ^ Address ^ Email ^ Contact No. ^ | + | |
| - | | Leroy Merlin | Rua C. C. Parque Nascente, Estrada Exterior da Circunvalação, | + | |
| - | | Tubinox | TubinoxFilpres - AÇOS INOXIDÁVEIS, | + | |
| - | | Aki | Aki Porto, Estrada da Circunvalação, | + | |
| - | | Vitorinox | Vitorinox, Lda. Rua do Castanhal, 334, Zona Industrial da Maia I - Sector II, Gemunde, 4475-122 MAIA, PORTUGAL | info@vitorinox.pt | Tel: +351 229 437 800 or +351 229 015 707 | | + | |
| - | | Madeivouga | Zona Industrial de Taboeira - Apartado 724, 3801-801 Aveiro, Portugal | encomendas@madeivouga.pt | Tel: +351 234 300 800 | | + | |
| - | | Festo | Festo - Automação, | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | ==== 7.6 Manufacture Process ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The manufacturing process has been planned ahead of the arriving materials to optimize our task allocation for each component, which is suited to a team members skill set. The forward planning has allowed us to optimize the equipment, material, time and roles of each member. (INSERT TASK TABLE ORDERING JOBS IN ORDER & PERSON) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.6.1 Preparation === | + | |
| - | The preparation before fixing the material together is a vital point in the manufacture stage. Due to the type of bonding we will use errors cannot be made at this stage, in removing these errors we took several precautions. Initially we will build two stands for the wing with a minimal degree of error as this will act as our mold. The stands will be made out of 19mm thick MDF board and designed as shown below in figure {{ref> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <figure flabel123> | + | |
| - | {{ :: | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Cut the " | + | |
| - | * Cut the mold at the bottom and glue it to make it stable. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This MDF mold is positioned 1.5 metres apart and in perfect alignment, these cannot move during the course of the manufacturing process to achieve perfect alignment in the sail. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Once arrived the maritime plywood sheets will be optimized fully by stenciling all material required for the coverage and ribs of both the main sail and stabilizer. Using the cavalete madeira tables we can keep these sheets level and in position while penciling and cutting, these will be positioned equally to ensure stability. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | During this time some of the balsa sheets will be placed in water overnight to allow the panels to soften and become flexible until the material dry’s. In this time the material will be positioned over a PVC pipe that has been cut in half, a weight is added to allow the balsa panel to follow the curvature of the pipe. This will allow the balsa to dry in this position and when applied to the leading edge of the rigid-wing sail reduce the brittleness of the material. The other balsa panels will be coated in an epoxy paint to increase the rigidity while maintaining the flexural properties required in the rigid-wing. These panels will dry for a period of 24 hours and be stored until required in the manufacturing section. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | All the equipment has been sourced from the workshop to ensure the manufacturing stage can be complete. The ISEP workshop has allowed us access to achieve the manufacturing process without outsourcing our blueprints to an available lazer cutting facility. In the workshop, with the help of Vitor we have found an array of tools and equipment, below is a listed table with the findings: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe15> | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 850px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Tool ^ Use ^ Quantity ^ | + | |
| - | | Pillar Drill | Drilling holes of certain diameters vertically for precise holes, both in wood and metal | 1 | | + | |
| - | | Hand Saw | Cutting wood | 3 | | + | |
| - | | Hack Saw | Cutting Metal | 1 | | + | |
| - | | Hand File | Remove small quantities of Metal/wood while offering a smoother finish | 1 | | + | |
| - | | Electric Jigsaw | Cutting wood out of large sheets with ease | 1 | | + | |
| - | | Sand Paper | Gradually smooth surfaces of wood/metal by the use of different grades | 10 | | + | |
| - | | Pencil | Used to mark wooden surface to ensure precise lines for cutting | 4 | | + | |
| - | | Wooden Stands | Elevate the wooden panels off the ground when cutting is being executed | 3 | | + | |
| - | | Calking Gun | Pneumatic hand application tool for unipac glue, Sika 292 | 1 | | + | |
| - | | Paint Brush | Apply all paint and finishing products to the sail | 2 | | + | |
| - | | Gloves | Protection of hands during the glue and painting process | 4 | | + | |
| - | | Vice | Holds metal/wood in position when working on, can be used to file/cut etc. | 1 | | + | |
| - | | G-Clamp | Once adhesive is applied the G-clamp holds the I beam in position | 6 | | + | |
| - | | | | | | + | |
| - | | | | | | + | |
| - | | | | | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.6.2 Cutting Process === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.6.2.1 Coverage & Ribs == | + | |
| - | The cutting process must have a high degree of accuracy because minimal errors must be achieved when completing the wing. Using the predetermined stencils as a guide, the maritime plywood sheets are positioned on the cavalete madeira tables and cut using a electric jigsaw to precisely cut each rib and wing coverage. The blueprints for the wing coverage of the main wing, stabilizer and design of each rib can be seen in the link below: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | (INSERT BLUE PRINTS OF EACH WING & SKIN AREA) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | These blueprints will be used as the stencils that can ensure the degree of accuracy required during the manufacturing stage. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Cut the two plywood skin from the plywood panels. | + | |
| - | * Cut the space inside the two skin (take attention to not cut it in the proximity of the ribs). | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.6.2.2 I Beam Masts == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The wooden mast for both the stabilizer and main wing will be made from a combination of maritime plywood and pinewood. The process of joining these two materials required an overnight bonding process, before this the central beam for each position (main sail and stabilizer) must be cut from the maritime plywood sheets. The following dimensions must be the following: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | |
| - | <table tlabe15> | + | |
| - | <WRAP box 350px center> | + | |
| - | ^ Beam Position ^ Dimensions (mm) ^ Quantity ^ | + | |
| - | | Main Sail I Beam | 2400 x 190 x 4 | 2 | | + | |
| - | | Stabilizer I Beam | 1000 x 70 x 4 | 1 | | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Not only must these panels be cut too these sizes but holes of 30mm must be cut in the central point of the x-axis **mm** from the base of the I beam where the wires can pass through and access the remaining sail components. These beam cuttings will be glued to four pine wood members, which will produce the following profile: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.6.2.3 Stainless Steel Mast == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.6.2.4 Stainless Steel Stabiliser Beams == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.6.2 Bonding Process | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.6.3.1 Dry Assembly == | + | |
| - | A dry assembly of the bonding process must be done before the real process to guarantee the correct positioning of all material before the final application of the adhesive. Once this is done, alterations cannot be made, making it the most vital part of the rigid-wing sail manufacturing process. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Like the real bonding process all precautions must be made to certify flawless alignment of the sail. The wing coverage will be positioned in the MDF mold connecting at the bottom of the V shape, from here the ribs will be distributed 350 mm for the duration of the 2400 mm skin. The I beam mast will be put into position and the airfoil heads will be placed on top creating the skeleton structure. Once this has been assembled and checked for imperfections it will be disabled and the bonding preparation must begin. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.6.3.2 Bonding == | + | |
| - | Before the bonding stage begins preparation must be made in the surrounding area and MDF mold, the rolo filme protector must be positioned on the floor and around the MDF to prevent the Sikaflex 292 adhesive bonding with the plywood coverage. If this was not done and the adhesive joined the mold to the wing it would prove extremely difficult to disconnect the materials. | + | |
| - | The Sikaflex 292 also has the following requirements before glue is applied. The surfaces must be of sound quality, clean, dry and free from all traces of grease, oil and dust. As a rule the surfaces must be prepared in accordance with the instructions given in the current edition of the [[https:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Sikaflex 292 cartridges come in a unipac tube that this is easily positioned in a caulking gun for the application purposes, the tip of the nozzle must be cut before application can begin. The pneumatic tool dispenser allows for the user to distribute the adhesive in all positions of the rigid-wing sail skeleton and skin. To ensure uniform thickness of adhesive when compressed, it is recommended to apply the adhesive in the form of a triangular bead. The optimum temperature for substrate and adhesive is between 15°C and 25°C, at these temperatures the adhesive will dry in approximately 40 minutes. Although to guarantee the success of this, it will be left for triple the time stated. Therefore the adhesive will be left for a period of 2 hours. [[http:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.6.4 Finishing Process === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | == 7.6.4.1 Sanding == | + | |
| - | == 7.6.4.2 Paint == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.6.5 Electronic Connections Process === | + | |
| - | Prior to the bonding process this is a a high priority for us to understand the positioning and pathways of the connections to the following electrical components, Battery, Navigation Lights, Wind Sensor. These must be connected before glueing process begins because once glued it will be extremely difficult to replace wiring although the skin coverage has been designed for components to be replaced and upgraded, it is mandatory for us to consider the pathway for these wires without obstructing the wooden structure. | + | |
| - | == 7.6.5.1 Battery == | + | |
| - | == 7.6.5.2 Navigation Lights == | + | |
| - | == 7.6.5.3 Wind Sensor == | + | |
| - | == 7.6.5.4 Supply Lines == | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 7.7 Functionalities ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.7.1 Mast Rotation === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.7.2 Actuator Synchronisation === | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | === 7.7.3 ... === | + | |
| - | ==== 7.8 Tests and Results ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== 7.9 Conclusion ==== | + | |
| - | //Provide here the conclusions of this chapter and introduce the next chapter.// | + | |
| - | ===== 8. Conclusions ===== | + | |
| - | ==== 8.1 Discussion ==== | + | |
| - | //Provide here what was achieved (related with the initial objectives) and what is missing (related with the initial objectives) of the project.// | + | |
| - | ==== 8.2 Future Development ==== | + | |
| - | //Provide here your recommendations for future work.// | + | |
| - | ===== Bibliography ===== | + | |
| - | * [1] Ordered List ItemUnordered List Item Name, Title, Year. Available at URL [Accessed in February 2015].\\ | + | |
| - | * [2] Ordered List ItemMaritime Affairs, available at http:// | + | |
| - | * [3] Larsson, Ralf and Eliasson, Principle of Yacht Design, 2000 | + | |
| - | * [4] Principle power, Wind float available at http:// | + | |
| - | * [5] Dean and company, the traingle online http:// | + | |
| - | * [6] Technologies for Autonomous Sailing: Wings and Wind Sensors [[http:// | + | |
| - | * [7] Fabrice Le Bars, Luc Jaulin: Robotic Sailing 2013 | + | |
| - | * [8] Solar Cell Comparison Chart – Mono-, Polycrystalline and Thin Film [[http:// | + | |
| - | * [9] Which Solar Panel Type is Best? Mono- vs. Polycrystalline vs. Thin Film [[http:// | + | |
| - | * [10] Types of solar panel [[http:// | + | |
| - | * [11] The Real Lifespan of Solar Panels [[http:// | + | |
| - | * [12] Batteries [[http:// | + | |
| - | * [13] What’s the Best Battery? [[http:// | + | |
| - | * [14] Joshua Earnest: Wind Power Technology | + | |
| - | * [15] A fistful of Euros http:// | + | |
| - | * [16] Green Report http:// | + | |
| - | * [17] National Geographic Center http:// | + | |
| - | * [18] http:// | + | |
| - | * [19] Bernd Kohler, K-designs, | + | |
| - | * [20] Aero-hydrodynamics and the Performance of Sailing Yachts:The Science Behind Sailing Yachts and their Design; | + | |
| - | * [21] On the Stability of Sailboats; Anthony Craggs; Page 15-17 | + | |
| - | * [22]Aero-hydrodynamics and the Performance of Sailing Yachts:The Science Behind Sailing Yachts and their Design; | + | |
| - | * [23] Float Your Boat!!:The Evolution and Science of Sailing; | + | |
| - | * [24,25] Practical Ship Production; A.W.Carmichael; | + | |
| - | * [26] Aero-hydrodynamics and the Performance of Sailing Yachts:The Science Behind Sailing Yachts and their Design; | + | |
| - | * [27,28,29] Grundlagen des Marketing; | + | |
| - | * [30] Living Planet Report 2014; Species and spaces, people and places; | + | |
| - | * [31] Economic Sustainability The business of staying in business; Deborah Doane & Alex MacGillivray New Economics Foundation; | + | |
| - | * [32] http:// | + | |
| - | * [33]http:// | + | |
| - | * [34] "The Impact of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices and Innovation Performance on Economic Sustainability "; 2015; Norsiah Hami and Mohd Razali Muhamad and Zuhriah Ebrahim | + | |
| - | * [35]Sea temperaure Rise; | + | |
| - | * [36] Overfishing http:// | + | |
| - | * [37] Technology Roadmap, | + | |
| - | * [38] What is GPS? http:// | + | |
| - | * [39] http:// | + | |
| - | * [40] http:// | + | |
| - | * [41] http:// | + | |
| - | * [42] http:// | + | |
| - | * [43] http:// | + | |
| - | * [44] http:// | + | |
| - | * [45] http:// | + | |
| - | * [46] http:// | + | |
| - | * [47] http:// | + | |
| - | * [48] http:// | + | |
| - | * [49] http:// | + | |
| - | * [50] http:// | + | |
| - | * [51] http:// | + | |
| - | * [52] http:// | + | |
| - | * [53] http:// | + | |
| - | * [54] Beate Littig, Erich Grieβler 2005 Social sustainability: | + | |
| - | * [55] Epoxy Resins, Chemistry and Technology Second Edition, Clayton A.May | + | |
| - | * [56] http:// | + | |
| - | ===== Appendices | + | |